Druitt's as good a suspect as any, and better than some, and fair play to Dan Farson for first identifying him as a suspect.
However - and these points have been raised before but stand raising again - the only documentary source of evidence against Druitt is Macnaghten. And Mac said he destroyed a lot of documents relevant to the Ripper Case. Of course, he got Druitt's profession wrong, and also the date of his disappearance, which he said was 10th November 1888. Probably no big deal, but perhaps these points do demonstrate that Mac's memory was not as infallible as some would believe. The 'private information' that Mac alludes to is of course from an origin completely unknown (or so I believe); it could have come from anywhere, including the celebrated West of England MP. Mac also said that it was alleged that Druitt was 'sexually insane', a term which in Victorian times could refer to a masturbation habit. or homosexuality, or both. It has been suggested many times that the reason Druitt got the bullet from Mr Valentine's school was that he was taking liberties with the pupils. As good a reason as any, I'd say.
As far as I'm aware, the only other possible reference to Druitt's being a Ripper suspect is down to G R Sims, who stated in The Referee magazine in 1903 that the man found drowned in The Thames was one of three possible suspects for Jack, and that the police were looking for him at the time his corpse was dragged out of the river. Sims also adds that Druitt was suspected not only by Scotland Yard, but also by his friends. Why should the police be looking for Druitt at the time prior to his disappearance? Because of goings-on at Mr Valentine's school, or because they thought he was the Ripper?
Due acknowledgment to my (old) copy of 'The Jack The Ripper A-Z' for confirmation of some of the above, most of which I've dredged from my memory.
G
However - and these points have been raised before but stand raising again - the only documentary source of evidence against Druitt is Macnaghten. And Mac said he destroyed a lot of documents relevant to the Ripper Case. Of course, he got Druitt's profession wrong, and also the date of his disappearance, which he said was 10th November 1888. Probably no big deal, but perhaps these points do demonstrate that Mac's memory was not as infallible as some would believe. The 'private information' that Mac alludes to is of course from an origin completely unknown (or so I believe); it could have come from anywhere, including the celebrated West of England MP. Mac also said that it was alleged that Druitt was 'sexually insane', a term which in Victorian times could refer to a masturbation habit. or homosexuality, or both. It has been suggested many times that the reason Druitt got the bullet from Mr Valentine's school was that he was taking liberties with the pupils. As good a reason as any, I'd say.
As far as I'm aware, the only other possible reference to Druitt's being a Ripper suspect is down to G R Sims, who stated in The Referee magazine in 1903 that the man found drowned in The Thames was one of three possible suspects for Jack, and that the police were looking for him at the time his corpse was dragged out of the river. Sims also adds that Druitt was suspected not only by Scotland Yard, but also by his friends. Why should the police be looking for Druitt at the time prior to his disappearance? Because of goings-on at Mr Valentine's school, or because they thought he was the Ripper?
Due acknowledgment to my (old) copy of 'The Jack The Ripper A-Z' for confirmation of some of the above, most of which I've dredged from my memory.
G
Comment