Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Statement of Peter Druitt 1972

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Statement of Peter Druitt 1972

    The passage below comes from the Charleston Gazette of 15 Nov 1972. In this Dan Farson is interviewed and Peter Druitt is quoted as saying there was a family tradition that MJD was the Ripper.
    Does anyone know what relation this Peter Druitt was/is to MJD and did he ever make any further statement of the details of this "family tradition"?
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Originally posted by Chris Scott View Post
    The passage below comes from the Charleston Gazette of 15 Nov 1972. In this Dan Farson is interviewed and Peter Druitt is quoted as saying there was a family tradition that MJD was the Ripper.
    Does anyone know what relation this Peter Druitt was/is to MJD and did he ever make any further statement of the details of this "family tradition"?
    Peter Druitt was a great-grandson of Montague's uncle, Dr Robert Druitt, according to Farson's book. The quotation from him is printed there, but I can't see the claim about a "family tradition" (I'm looking at the 1973 paperback edition).

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Chris and Chris!

      Greetings Chris x 2,

      I agree with the latter Chris, that Farson did not quote Dr Peter Druitt as saying there was a JTR tradition in the family.Farson would have if Dr Peter had .(If you know what I mean? ) .


      Dr Peter D. was quoted in an English paper as saying: " JTR eh? This will make my patients sit up!"

      From memory, that story was published in English newspapers too.

      JOHN RUFFELS.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hello you all!

        Thank you for the information!

        Farson's writing could be interpreted as cornwellish, so to say!

        All the best
        Jukka
        "When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"

        Comment


        • #5
          Link to the full Brian Dunning article
          Dave McConniel

          Comment


          • #6
            I was looking over the complete article - it is interesting (Cream had a relative in Racine, Wisconsin?), but it is still a rush job. The last paragraph shows that. Conan Doyle first concocted Holmes in 1886 and A STUDY IN SCARLET appeared in 1887 - both before the Ripper murders. However, with such classic botched jobs by the police as the Esther Pay case in 1882 or the Thames Torso murders, Doyle may have felt a fictional super-detective was necessary.

            Comment


            • #7
              English VersionOf Farson Interview

              Whilst churning my various files on this and that, I glimpsed a photocopy of the English version of an interview with Dr Peter Druitt.

              Lost again now, the clipping was from the "Daily Express". (I think).

              JOHN RUFFELS.

              Comment

              Working...
              X