I'm basically questioning the whole theory of personality types and modern psychology/psychiatry as a pseudoscience with little bearing on reality.
Probably an overstatement, as I'm sure it has an approximation role, but the counter perspective needs to be aired occassionally, especially in a world where much of Freudian and Jungian theory, once seen as truths, has been refuted.
My current position is that healthy people don't have personality types, any more than there's any such thing as 'human nature', as these are signs of dysfunction, though no doubt very common ones. Normative behaviour (though perhaps rare in modern society!) is far more diverse, mutable and rational than most generalisers would want to believe IMO.
'To generalize is to be an idiot. To particularize is the alone distinction of merit. General knowledges are those knowledges that idiots possess'.
William Blake
Probably an overstatement, as I'm sure it has an approximation role, but the counter perspective needs to be aired occassionally, especially in a world where much of Freudian and Jungian theory, once seen as truths, has been refuted.
My current position is that healthy people don't have personality types, any more than there's any such thing as 'human nature', as these are signs of dysfunction, though no doubt very common ones. Normative behaviour (though perhaps rare in modern society!) is far more diverse, mutable and rational than most generalisers would want to believe IMO.
'To generalize is to be an idiot. To particularize is the alone distinction of merit. General knowledges are those knowledges that idiots possess'.
William Blake
Comment