Suspect Witnesses?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Herlock Sholmes
    Commissioner
    • May 2017
    • 23573

    #781
    Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post

    I must be missing something ... What exactly is the purpose of delving into Schwartz's domestic and lodging arrangements? How does that affect his evidence?
    There is no purpose or merit in it whatsoever Doc. Andrew is forever trying to read between the lines to spot any hints and a lie or a plot. Schwartz wife did the moving whilst he was out during the day. The fact that he gave his address as Ellen Street is proof that he too had moved to the new address. We can file this point away in the ‘strange’ file alongside the idea that Cross wearing his apron to the inquest was somehow indicative of guilt.
    Herlock Sholmes

    ”I don’t know who Jack the Ripper was…and neither do you.”

    Comment

    • Herlock Sholmes
      Commissioner
      • May 2017
      • 23573

      #782
      Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post

      So, the lodging arrangement at 22 Ellen St was as informal as the arrangements at Miller's Court?

      If yes, then why was the move said to be expected? If the move has been agreed to and the arrangement is informal, we move from expectation to virtual certainty. If no move has been agreed to, then how could Schwartz know where his new lodgings were located?

      If no, then the implication is that Mrs Schwartz signed the lease.
      Two questions for you..

      1) Why has the subject of Schwartz house move become a source of such endless fascination for you?

      2) Why do you never just “spit it out”? What I mean by that is why don’t you just say outright, in plain English and without hints, what you think occurred with Schwartz and the move and, while you’re at it, why won’t you answer the question that I asked a while ago when I asked you to tell us openly what you think occurred in Berner Street.

      You clearly think that there was more than meets the eye in Berner Street and yet you won’t explain what you think that it was.
      Herlock Sholmes

      ”I don’t know who Jack the Ripper was…and neither do you.”

      Comment

      • FrankO
        Superintendent
        • Feb 2008
        • 2170

        #783
        Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post
        I had considered that, but when Brown left the Chandler's shop less than 5 minutes later (he said 4 minutes) there was a couple he walked past and saw standing bear the board school in Fairclough St, who don't appear to have been there when Brown was on his way to the Chandler's shop 4 minutes earlier.

        That means that the couple he saw arrived in Fairclough Street when Brown was in the shop.

        And yet this couple (if they're the same couple that spoke to Mortimer) after the murder, didn't see or hear the assault that Schwartz claimed happened.

        On that basis, I find it unlikely that the assault occurred after Brown.
        Hi RD,

        I still think it's quite possible that the assault took place while Brown was in the shop. As he crossed the street, there's a good chance that he wouldn't notice Mr BS coming down Berner Street with Schwartz some distance behind him. After all, they would be more or less behind him (over his right shoulder).

        At that point, the couple may still have been not too far away, but still far away enough not to see or hear the assault. For instance, they could have been in Queen's Court, Batty's Court or Hampshire Court, off Batty Street. Or even in Christian Street, near the Beehive Pub.

        The assault needn't have consisted of more than the initial scuffle between Mr BS & the woman and then Schwartz running away almost immediately followed by Pipeman. Schwartz could be out of sight from the intersection near the club by turning right or left when reaching Ellen Street (if he fled all the way down Berner Street or by turning left (south) on Backchurch Lane (if he fled westwards along Fairclough Street. Both possibilities would not have taken more than 1 minute. If we'd add half a minute for good measure to have Mr BS get away from the scene and turn into either Batty's Gardens or Hampshire Court, off Berner Street, then there would still have been 1.5 to 2.5 minutes time for the couple to arrive at the corner of the board school.

        Now, Brown said he heard the screams about a quarter of an hour after he had got back home and from the shop to his home would have taken him a litlle less than a minute. At that point, the couple would have been standing at the corner for some 17 or 18 minutes, which they might very easily have been estimating as about 20 minutes.

        But if this is not what happened, then I'd still agree that the assault must have taken place before the couple arrived at the corner.

        Cheers,
        Frank


        "You can rob me, you can starve me and you can beat me and you can kill me. Just don't bore me."
        Clint Eastwood as Gunny in "Heartbreak Ridge"

        Comment

        Working...
        X