Suspect Witnesses?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NotBlamedForNothing
    Assistant Commissioner
    • Jan 2020
    • 3595

    #301
    Brown didn't see a girl, he saw a woman and identified her at the mortuary.

    There is reason to believe that Charles Letchford was the male half of the first couple. Had the female half been Sarah Grant, it would seem she must have moved between 1888-10-01 and 1889-12-25. Not inconceivable, but of course I'm just speculating on her identity.
    Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing

    Comment

    • The Rookie Detective
      Superintendent
      • Apr 2019
      • 2188

      #302
      Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

      Yes, and this, at midnight.
      Our first question should be, what is a nice girl doing out by herself at such a late hour?

      As I suggested, maybe she sneaked out when her parents went to bed?
      Or, maybe she was a servant girl, who got off at 11:30 pm, and snook out of her room to meet her date?
      The very fact she seems to have been out so late by herself suggests this was a meeting that would not be approved of by, either her family or her employer or associates.
      Because she did walk up Berner St. by herself, it is quite reasonable to suggest she had to walk back by herself, and for the same reason, whatever that reason was.
      But you're deliberately ignoring my point, and in the process contradicting yourself.

      You're saying that the girl walked back down Berner Street alone.

      Which would be fine by itself IF her young man never walked down Berner St with her.

      But you're then saying that before doing walking down Berner St alone to go home, that she had already walked down Berner Street with her young man beforehand, and then gone back up to the top of Berner St again, before then again coming back down by herself!

      That's nonsense

      Because you said yourself in the same breath that the young man wouldn't have walked down Berner St because maybe the girl's parents didn't approve.

      Which is akin to having your cake and eating it.

      You're also using the times stated as gospel.

      Which again is interesting, because the same should then apply to Mortimer, who said 1st hand that she stood at her door for almost the whole time between 12.30am to 1am and saw nobody but a man walk hurriedly with a black bag.

      Mortimer never said 1st hand that she was as her door for only 10 minutes, she said around 30 minutes running up to the time Stride was discovered.

      So we have the young couple from midnight to half past
      and Mortimer from half past midnight to 1am.

      Schwartz lied
      Pc Smith was absent
      Lave lied about going as far as the street
      etc...etc...


      Try reading all the articles relating to the young sweetheart couple with the timing of midnight to half past omitted...


      ...it then becomes clear they all refer to the same couple.


      The entire episode can be resolved if the young man never walks down Berner Street.

      Because that then proves that the couple on the corner for around 20 minutes, weren't the same couple that went for a walk along Commercial Road.

      But...that's not what the young girl implies when she refers to going back down Berner St in the context of her being accompanied by her young man.

      He either walks down Berner St or he doesn't.

      The suggestion he walks down Berner St with her, but she somehow DOESNT THEN GO HOME, so they then walk back UP Berner St again, before they then say "Goodnight" and only then she walks home alone by going back down Berner St alone (even though they have only just walked down Berner St together a few minutes earlier)... is utter nonsense.
      Last edited by The Rookie Detective; Today, 07:55 AM.
      "Great minds, don't think alike"

      Comment

      Working...
      X