Originally posted by Columbo
View Post
You are correct as part of my investigation I wanted to cover all aspects of the medical evidence including the suggestion that the killer could have been a butcher, along with the issues surrounding the apron piece.
As you can see despite challenging the medical evidence from 1888 there are many that choose not to accept those findings but still rely on the 1888 facts and evidence, that fine they are entitled to their beliefs.

so I guess challenging the evidence is really the point of this thread. Outside of a few procedural and medical items such as time of death, how much based on the available evidence can a modern day person provide enlightenment on the 1888 information. Unless there was a cache of new documentation that has been discovered we don't have anything new. I was thinking just a few minutes ago how much of the research has been saved from the 1973 JTR series. I understand Stewart Evans might have that information. that was over 40 years ago and much more documentation was available.
Comment