ON the BBC's excellent Shadow of the Rippe documentary from 1988, surely the most level headed of all docs on the subject, Christopher Frayling at one point wanders Wiltons Music Hall explaining how it was really a glorified brothel with toffs taking girls from the stage up to the rooms for cheap sex.
He also says that the toff be he Burlington Bertie or Champagne Charlie had become a stock figure by then, "jeered at by the locals, cheered at by the men upstairs". This suggests an audience of poor and wealthy. It made me wonder: were there really that many toffs frequenting the East End back then? Wouldn't it have been dangerous for them? Wouldn't they have stood out? Or was it a common practice? We so often are asked to see the Ripper as a toff and Ive always wondered how plentiful toffs (or coaches for that matter) were there and then.
He also says that the toff be he Burlington Bertie or Champagne Charlie had become a stock figure by then, "jeered at by the locals, cheered at by the men upstairs". This suggests an audience of poor and wealthy. It made me wonder: were there really that many toffs frequenting the East End back then? Wouldn't it have been dangerous for them? Wouldn't they have stood out? Or was it a common practice? We so often are asked to see the Ripper as a toff and Ive always wondered how plentiful toffs (or coaches for that matter) were there and then.
Comment