writing on the wall

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • erobitha
    replied
    Originally posted by Fleetwood Mac View Post

    Both sentences make perfect sense to someone from a working-class English background.
    Is this a game of working class top trumps? What score would I get for growing up on one of the roughest council estates in East London?

    It doesn't make any sense in its purest form.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by Pcdunn View Post
    Interesting articles! Thanks for sharing them. Some insight into who the writers of graffiti were- like today, often juves.
    FIFY

    Leave a comment:


  • milchmanuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

    Speculation that the "nothing" of the graffiti was intended to refer to her words on leaving the City jail goes back many years.
    As with the 'Juewes", that some suggested refers to the Old Jewery, the address of City Police headquarters.

    In other words, it's the fault of the city police.

    Major Smith, we are told, ordered his constables to follow any couples out late at night.
    just rereading your post.
    city police headquarters.
    they found a torso in .well in the basement of Scotland yards building .
    is this pointing to conspiracies' !
    that i have not yet read about.
    or inside job ! police man maybe ?
    golden state killer was a cop .
    Last edited by milchmanuk; 08-02-2022, 05:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Christian
    replied
    Originally posted by Pcdunn View Post
    Interesting articles! Thanks for sharing them. Some insight into who the writers of graffiti were- like today, often juveniles.
    Disagree with juveniles!! Some of the best writers of graffiti are 40 plus!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    Interesting articles! Thanks for sharing them. Some insight into who the writers of graffiti were- like today, often juveniles.

    Leave a comment:


  • SkipToTheEnd
    replied
    Originally posted by Filby View Post

    How common was graffiti in the East End in 1888? I'm serious about this question. I've studied a lot of photos and not really noticed much which I found quite astonishing. Of course I could be entirely wrong, but to me, this makes somewhat of a difference, at least in my mind, as to whether it was happenstance or if not, very possiby written deliberately by JtR post-murders.
    I always found this article quite interesting:

    Spray-paint was not available to the Victorians, so was there graffiti in Victorian London? Having just removed the 'tag' that appeared on m...


    it was common enough to be in police manuals and be taken to court over etc.

    and also this, even the police were up to it:

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    City-constable Lewis Robinson, 931, deposed: At half-past eight, on the night of Saturday, Sept. 29, while on duty in High-street, Aldgate, I saw a crowd of persons outside No. 29, surrounding a woman whom I have since recognised as the deceased.
    The Coroner: What state was she in? - Drunk. Lying on the footway? - Yes. I asked the crowd if any of them knew her or where she lived, but got no answer. I then picked her up and sat her against the shutters, but she fell down sideways. With the aid of a fellow-constable I took her to Bishopsgate Police-station. There she was asked her name, and she replied "Nothing." She was then put into a cell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by C. F. Leon View Post

    Although it's considered more likely that Eddowes actually gave no response to the question and therefore "nothing" was put down as meaning "she didn't say anything", you are the first time that I've seen anyone make the connection between BOTH Eddowes' response and the graffiti including the same word.

    It's probably of absolutely no significance at all, but still is interesting.
    Speculation that the "nothing" of the graffiti was intended to refer to her words on leaving the City jail goes back many years.
    As with the 'Juewes", that some suggested refers to the Old Jewery, the address of City Police headquarters.

    In other words, it's the fault of the city police.

    Major Smith, we are told, ordered his constables to follow any couples out late at night.

    Leave a comment:


  • C. F. Leon
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    So ..... Alamy the Ripper
    It's a better suggestion than SOME of the ones people have seriously made.

    Leave a comment:


  • C. F. Leon
    replied
    Originally posted by milchmanuk View Post
    ...

    perhaps the victim told him "my names NOTHING " loudly & and hence the word in his riddle.
    Although it's considered more likely that Eddowes actually gave no response to the question and therefore "nothing" was put down as meaning "she didn't say anything", you are the first time that I've seen anyone make the connection between BOTH Eddowes' response and the graffiti including the same word.

    It's probably of absolutely no significance at all, but still is interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • milchmanuk
    replied
    perhaps he was standing in that entrance looking at the sky or moon completed in his ascension holdings his hands by his side dripping .

    perhaps the victim told him "my names NOTHING " loudly & and hence the word in his riddle.

    Leave a comment:


  • milchmanuk
    replied
    going back to my post #84
    Torah a set of five books
    behind a veil
    gods word.

    conical five
    apron
    his written word.

    graffiti
    his becoming a god.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    So ..... Alamy the Ripper

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood Mac
    replied
    Originally posted by erobitha View Post

    you will get a sentence that makes sense.
    Both sentences make perfect sense to someone from a working-class English background.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood Mac
    replied
    Originally posted by JeffHamm View Post
    Hi all,


    The Juewes are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.
    The Juewes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.

    Both are effectively saying that the Jews are to be blamed.
    'Couldn't disagree more with this. I grew up in a working-class English environment, in a part of the country where old habits die harder than most other parts of the country. A lot of everyday vernacular in this part of the country has survived as the centuries have passed by, to the point that even Old Norse words that sound nothing like English to most other English speaking peoples remain in everyday existence and are spoken by large swathes of the people in this area. The point of saying that is much of the working-class language spoken in London in 1888 may mean little to most English speaking peoples, but that sort of sentence structure remains alive and well in this small part of the country.

    In my neck of the woods, it remains commonplace to hear: "you're not getting wrong for nothing". Substitute 'wrong' for 'blamed' and it's the same thing. What this statement means is: you are being told off/blamed/getting wrong because your actions deserve it.

    The former statement means: Jewish people will not accept responsibility for something which they haven't done.

    The latter statement means: Jewish people are being blamed because they deserve it.

    The former most likely written by someone who is Jewish; the latter most likely written by someone who is not Jewish.

    The placing of the word "not" is of huge significance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X