Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Matters-Stewart Photos??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Columbo View Post
    Ok gonna show some ignorance here. Matters and Stewart?
    Ok got it. Leonard Matters.

    Comment


    • #17
      I can't remember the details, but there's a story somewhere about a journalist who wandered into Millers Court with a camera, and was told in no uncertain terms that he should put it away if he wanted to leave the Court intact. Perhaps someone can help with this story.
      Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Columbo View Post
        Ok gonna show some ignorance here. Matters and Stewart?
        Two early authors Matters 1929 & Stewart 1938 both books have incredible images in them highly sought after

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Christian View Post

          Two early authors Matters 1929 & Stewart 1938 both books have incredible images in them highly sought after
          Thank you. I have got to start using google more effectively.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Columbo View Post

            Thank you. I have got to start using google more effectively.
            Lol

            Comment


            • #21
              Hi all,

              Just as a friendly reminder for the old and perhaps useful information for the new:

              No photos from William Stewart’s book, “Jack the Ripper: A New Theory” (1938) may be posted on casebook.org.

              Many years ago we were asked to remove all such photos by the Stewart family and have complied.

              JM

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by jmenges View Post
                Hi all,

                Just as a friendly reminder for the old and perhaps useful information for the new:

                No photos from William Stewart’s book, “Jack the Ripper: A New Theory” (1938) may be posted on casebook.org.

                Many years ago we were asked to remove all such photos by the Stewart family and have complied.

                JM
                Okay ;(

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by jmenges View Post
                  Hi all,

                  Just as a friendly reminder for the old and perhaps useful information for the new:

                  No photos from William Stewart’s book, “Jack the Ripper: A New Theory” (1938) may be posted on casebook.org.

                  Many years ago we were asked to remove all such photos by the Stewart family and have complied.

                  JM
                  That’s a shame. The book is hard and expensive to come by. Oh well.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Live in hope, my copy cost $5 !!!

                    Just avoid the obvious places and it can come to you.
                    dustymiller
                    aka drstrange

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post
                      Live in hope, my copy cost $5 !!!

                      Just avoid the obvious places and it can come to you.
                      Wow

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Christian View Post

                        Wow
                        I bought an old paperback copy published in the UK by Arrow books, 1964. It didn't have any photos in it!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Mark Hodgson View Post

                          I bought an old paperback copy published in the UK by Arrow books, 1964. It didn't have any photos in it!
                          No it has not - the first edition has all the incredible images in Mark!! I have quite a nice copy

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Also, do we know exactly when the Matters' photos were taken in Dorset Street? The demolition photo shows that time was running out for Miller's Court in June 1928.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Mark Hodgson View Post
                              Also, do we know exactly when the Matters' photos were taken in Dorset Street? The demolition photo shows that time was running out for Miller's Court in June 1928.
                              Definitely around 11th June onwards Matters went back 3 days after taking his initial famous photos and millers court was gone!! An archeological group took photos of the whole area on 11th June and Millers Court was still standing unlike most of the area and Dorset street!!
                              hope that answers your question??

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Christian View Post

                                Definitely around 11th June onwards Matters went back 3 days after taking his initial famous photos and millers court was gone!! An archeological group took photos of the whole area on 11th June and Millers Court was still standing unlike most of the area and Dorset street!!
                                hope that answers your question??
                                In that June 11th demolition photo, several chimneys of number 26 are still smoking. When Matters visited, there was only one occupant left, so I’m thinking at least a couple of weeks more had passed.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X