No13. Photos (Mock-ups)

[Michael W Richards]

As I said, Michael, humans and the laws of physics just don't work like that. You accept that two very similar victims were murdered, a week apart, and can be connected to a single killer. But the crimes were NOT almost identical, despite your insistence. They were unique, just as all murders are. The killer evolved between these two, and in Hanbury Street he was able to experiment further and do what he either couldn't do in Buck's Row, or didn't think of doing. Even if he wasn't able to kill again [which is your theory, and as far as I can see, unique to you], the 'pattern' you speak of is clear for everyone to see, and is highly suggestive of a serial killer in the making. It just is. So on leaving Chapman's body, he'd have anticipated a next time, yes? And if the opportunity were to arise, it would be a new and unique experience, wouldn't it?

The only explanation I can see for you not understanding any of this is that you have it stuck in your mind that the killer of Nichols and Chapman had just a single motive - to acquire a womb for some mad purpose - and this somehow made him a different beast from any other prostitute killer before or since. You can't see beyond that motive [or to use your word, 'objective'] to the depravity of a man who murdered and mutilated women at will because he could.

Im not talking about the odds of a coin flip being heads or tails Caz. Im talking about 2 events 10 days apart that in every significant category are a match with each other. 2 almost identical acts, within the same area, under 2 weeks apart, and in the second more egregious attack, the uterus was specifically targetted and cut out "with no meaningless cuts". The only reason I dont "understand" your arguments on this issue is 1, because they are irrational and without substantiation in any known evidence, and because they are self serving speculations, again, not based on the any of the known evidence.

Now, explain to me why this killer on Nov 8th makes almost all of his cuts without any evident meaning. And a history of how Billy Bob in the US in 1963 suddenly became unhinged and committed acts that had nothing to do with the original reason he killed the first victim isnt an argument..its a waste of time.

[Jason]

These are absolutely incredible... Wonderful work

[caz]

Im not talking about the odds of a coin flip being heads or tails Caz. Im talking about 2 events 10 days apart that in every significant category are a match with each other. 2 almost identical acts, within the same area, under 2 weeks apart, and in the second more egregious attack, the uterus was specifically targetted and cut out "with no meaningless cuts". The only reason I dont "understand" your arguments on this issue is 1, because they are irrational and without substantiation in any known evidence, and because they are self serving speculations, again, not based on the any of the known evidence.

Now, explain to me why this killer on Nov 8th makes almost all of his cuts without any evident meaning. And a history of how Billy Bob in the US in 1963 suddenly became unhinged and committed acts that had nothing to do with the original reason he killed the first victim isnt an argument..its a waste of time.

I think we've had enough hints to shut up, Michael, and get back to the marvellous work Richard has been doing for us all. It's never a waste of time to look in closer detail at the Kelly crime scene, to try and make sense of what Jack did.

[Michael W Richards]

I think we've had enough hints to shut up, Michael, and get back to the marvellous work Richard has been doing for us all. It's never a waste of time to look in closer detail at the Kelly crime scene, to try and make sense of what Jack did.

His name was Jack was it? Thats great detective work. And to think its just listed as Unsolved.