Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

29 Hanbury street & Berner street murder locations??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    It also tells me that he must have been pretty sure that he could get back to safety very quickly. That he committed such an atrocious murder at 29 Hanbury Street at ~5:30 in the morning is particularly telling, I feel.

    BTW, I find the idea that he wasn't a local, but had a "bolthole", is invariably a plaster to patch over a favourite suspect theory. The odds are extremely high that he lived in the heart of Spitalfields, within easy reach of Hanbury St, Mitre Square and Dorset Street, which - interestingly - were also the sites of the most elaborate murders.
    Yes sam100% a local to transverse the streets-alleyways-roads back in 1888 to a desired location undetected fast would take local skill & knowlage for sure

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
      It also tells me that he must have been pretty sure that he could get back to safety very quickly. That he committed such an atrocious murder at 29 Hanbury Street at ~5:30 in the morning is particularly telling, I feel.
      Yes. Alternatively, he committed it at around 3.30-4.00, which is what Phillips claimed, more or less. That would tie the murder in seamlessly with the other weekday strikes, and make a lot of sense - he would be able to work under the cover of darkness and he would have a much better chance to slip away unnoticed. And all in all, once there is a pattern, it is always a useful guess that it would remain consistent throughout.

      Comment


      • #18
        I doubt whether committing the act so early was his choice. It may well have had a number of abortive attempts earlier in the night or Annie could have kept him talking for a lot longer than he had wanted (or he could have tried to convince her to go somewhere else, less busy but she was having non of it). As he thought he was on to a 'certainty' as it were, he continued, despite the risk of both the location and the fact that it was getting light.
        Best wishes,

        Tristan

        Comment


        • #19
          There is no record anywhere that suggests that any prostitute/client activity ever took place in the passageway at the International Club on Berner St... at any time. So I think in Liz Strides case, her killer chose that location, not her.
          Michael Richards

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
            It also tells me that he must have been pretty sure that he could get back to safety very quickly. That he committed such an atrocious murder at 29 Hanbury Street at ~5:30 in the morning is particularly telling, I feel.

            BTW, I find the idea that he wasn't a local, but had a "bolthole", is invariably a plaster to patch over a favourite suspect theory. The odds are extremely high that he lived in the heart of Spitalfields, within easy reach of Hanbury St, Mitre Square and Dorset Street, which - interestingly - were also the sites of the most elaborate murders.
            Wasn't there a way to Batty Street from Berner Sam?
            Michael Richards

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post

              Wasn't there a way to Batty Street from Berner Sam?
              Probably, Michael, as it wasn't far away at all.
              Kind regards, Sam Flynn

              "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post

                Wasn't there a way to Batty Street from Berner Sam?
                Yes, Hampshire Court led between the two, just North of the board school.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
                  There is no record anywhere that suggests that any prostitute/client activity ever took place in the passageway at the International Club on Berner St... at any time. So I think in Liz Strides case, her killer chose that location, not her.
                  Still a very odd choice to pick do you agree?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
                    There is no record anywhere that suggests that any prostitute/client activity ever took place in the passageway at the International Club on Berner St... at any time. So I think in Liz Strides case, her killer chose that location, not her.
                    Alternatively, this wasn't a prostitute/client scenario.
                    Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                    "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post

                      Alternatively, this wasn't a prostitute/client scenario.
                      Agree. This seems likely. I think it's more than a coincidence that the Socialist Club was right there. I think the killer was visiting it at the time.
                      Last edited by SuspectZero; 08-10-2019, 05:22 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        There is always the possibility that for some reason we will never know he wanted to kill the particular women that he did as opposed to just any woman and therefore he was willing to take the risk to bring that about.

                        c.d.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
                          There is no record anywhere that suggests that any prostitute/client activity ever took place in the passageway at the International Club on Berner St... at any time. So I think in Liz Strides case, her killer chose that location, not her.
                          Hello Michael,

                          How extensive and reliable would these records be? Was every location in Whitechapel under 24 hour surveillance and someone recorded prostitute/client activity on a regular basis? I can't help but recall the response of famed bank robber Willie Sutton when asked why he kept robbing banks. His response was "because that's where the money is." So if there was a club where a number of men met on a regular basis I would not be surprised that there would be some prostitute/client activity there even if it was on an infrequent basis.

                          c.d.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Fisherman View Post

                            Yes. Alternatively, he committed it at around 3.30-4.00, which is what Phillips claimed, more or less. That would tie the murder in seamlessly with the other weekday strikes, and make a lot of sense - he would be able to work under the cover of darkness and he would have a much better chance to slip away unnoticed. And all in all, once there is a pattern, it is always a useful guess that it would remain consistent throughout.
                            How do you square that statement against the differences in the Ripper and Torso murders?

                            Regards

                            Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                            “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                              How do you square that statement against the differences in the Ripper and Torso murders?
                              That question suggests you believe the Ripper and Torso murderers to be one and the same. If we accept this hypothesis, then there are no differences between the murders, if one believes the killer was motivated by the the underground anatomical parts business.
                              Last edited by SuspectZero; 08-11-2019, 08:59 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by SuspectZero View Post

                                That question suggests you believe the Ripper and Torso murderers to be one and the same. If we accept this hypothesis, then there are no differences between the murders, if one believes the killer was motivated by the the underground anatomical parts business.
                                I don’t believe that the two series were committed by the same man. I was just making the point in response to Fisherman’s point about a pattern remaining consistent and how that can possibly square when faced with the differences between the ripper murders and the Torso murders.
                                Regards

                                Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                                “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X