where did 'Jack' go after his slayings?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by dixon9 View Post
    hi

    i keep going over this (in my head) where could he have gone to get cleaned up,changed?
    I know the doctors on the scene said he could have made sure he was away from the flow of blood from the neck wounds,but surely his hands must have had blood etc on them when taking some of the organs etc.
    I am in the camp of a local man(poor man) but this thing about where does he get cleaned up realy does nag me.
    So does he wear gloves and just peels them off and dumps them somewhere?
    Does he have his own property,not a doss house resident?

    Sorry a bit long winded but i just cant get this ?? out of my head.
    Please any help

    Dixon9
    still learning
    Hi Dixon
    Great question-I have also wondered about this alot and the only conclusion I can come to is that JtR must have had a private place to go to-either it being his own room/residence and/or place of business. He was described by most witnesses as being at least respectfully dressed, and most experts beleive that the days the crimes ocurred meant he was employed so IMHO he could afford his own place. Also, i don't think he could have gone unnoticed after his crimes for so long if he did not have somewhere private to clean up, change clothes, hide out, keep his knife/knives, store organs etc.

    I definetly think he was local but not so poor that he did not have his own place.

    Leave a comment:


  • DYLAN
    replied
    Hi all.

    For me the answer's simple.

    The Ripper had a safe and secure bolt-hole not far away from his crimes, in Kings Bench Walk.

    It's a view I've held for nearly fifty years of studying the case, and I'm not going to change that view now.

    Of course, there will be a lot of dissenters here, but as we are never likely to see this mystery solved, one person's opinion is as good as any other's.

    All the best everyone.
    DYLAN

    Leave a comment:


  • Jane Coram
    replied
    Hi,

    I think you'd get a different answer to this question from every single person on the boards, depending on who their suspect is (if they have one). I'm a 'generic, poor, local' kind of girl, so I'd probably say that he just rolled up his sleeves to avoid getting blood on them, and sluiced off in a water butt or trough afterwards -- then went to sleep in the nearest door way or empty warehouse.

    Unless he had a good reason for carrying a knife around with him -- i.e he was a slaughterer, then he would have had somewhere to hide the knife. Incidentally Jimmy Mumford, when interviewed after Polly's murder said that the men at Barber's didn't take their knives home with them, and that seems to be standard for the time -- so if Jack were found walking around with a butcher's knife, he would have had some explaining to do -- even if he did work at a knackers or slaughteryard!

    He'd be wearing black clothes anyway if he was a working local -- almost every poor bloke did -- and the blood wouldn't have shown on them anyway. A great many of the locals stank, so no-one would really have noticed. Slaughtermen and knackers almost always wore blue and white uniforms for work (obviously with a few exceptions), so would not have had blood on their usual clothes outside work.

    Another bit of totally useless information that might be of interest: (I really do have too much time on my hands. Lol)

    In the 1888, most people in the area got their water from a mains water supply. How lovely -- nice running water all the time, just turn on the tap and watch the water pour out in a torrent. I think not.

    The water companies turned on the water for two hours at a time, three days a week, and under the lowest pressure imaginable. It would literally dribble out of the standpipe. The locals had to collect the water somehow and store it for the times they had none. They used mainly open water butts -- Which meant that there were literally hundreds of water butts in the area; in every alley, court and yard. Jack wouldn't have had much trouble finding somewhere to wash up after a killing.

    I just don't want to think about the poor buggers that might have gone there to get water for their morning cup of tea.

    Hugs

    Jane

    xxx
    Last edited by Jane Coram; 07-22-2010, 05:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mycroft
    replied
    In my opinion, the only answer is that he had somewhere nearby that he knew it was safe to go to. This means that he must of lived or worked in the immediate area. The suspect that I've read of that fits best with this, is Jacob Levy.He lived nearby, but also had a butchers nearby, which is where I think JtR fled to after murdering. He would have had all he needed to get cleaned up there or could have had a spare set of clothes to get changed into. Maybe he actually wore specific clothes when he "became" the Ripper.Also, it was quite normal for butchers to work in the early hours preparing the meat and who would look twice if the local butcher had some blood on his clothes? Plus ,he would of had a good selection of knives to choose from,which could simply be put back in their normal place, without any suspicion . To me ,it all fits.Many regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • bolo
    replied
    Hi again,

    Originally posted by dixon9 View Post
    would there be any chance he left a spare set of clothing in one of the alleyways,or would this be to much going down the 'epic film route?' lol
    in my opinion, it would not have been necessary for him to leave a full set of clothes in a secret stash, a single long, dark (and clean) overcoat would have been enough to hide possible blood stains. The LVP East End was a labyrinth of small alleys and byways, there also were lots of stables, unoccupied buildings, etc., read, plenty of options to unsuspiciously drop or pick something up.

    Of course that's just speculation, there's no evidence to back up the idea of a secret hideout, at least the house to house enquiries and similar efforts by the police turned up nothing of interest.

    Regards,

    Boris

    Leave a comment:


  • dixon9
    replied
    again thanks fisherman/garry


    Dixon9
    still learning

    Leave a comment:


  • Garry Wroe
    replied
    Overwhelmingly, Dixon, the Ripper-type offender targets those with whom he comes into everyday noncriminal contact. These are the people with whom he feels most comfortable and confident. Given the semi-vagrant lifestyles of his victims, therefore, I think it likely that the Whitechapel Murderer possessed little more than the clothes he stood up in.

    Regards.

    Garry Wroe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Dixon9 asks:

    "would there be any chance he left a spare set of clothing in one of the alleyways,or would this be to much going down the 'epic film route?'"

    Considering, Dixon, that the police actually found a rag inside a doorway and connected it to the Ripper, I fail to see that they would let a whole change of clothes - probably bloodied and all - go unnoticed.

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • dixon9
    replied
    thanks bolo,garry

    would there be any chance he left a spare set of clothing in one of the alleyways,or would this be to much going down the 'epic film route?' lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Garry Wroe
    replied
    Such was this man's familiarity with his stalking grounds, Dixon, that he probably visited the most convenient standpipe or water trough as he made towards his bolt-hole.

    Regards.

    Garry Wroe.

    Leave a comment:


  • bolo
    replied
    Hi Dixon,

    I don't have my books & papers handy at the moment but do remember a statement of one of the people involved in the investigation to the effect that the murderer probably had a place to live of his own or lived with his people who gave him a certain level of protection.

    Then again, there must have been other options for someone who knew the way around the place to find a quiet corner to wash and/or change clothes, that's why I wouldn't completely rule out the possibility of a "Jack the dosser".

    Regards,

    Boris

    Leave a comment:


  • dixon9
    started a topic where did 'Jack' go after his slayings?

    where did 'Jack' go after his slayings?

    hi

    i keep going over this (in my head) where could he have gone to get cleaned up,changed?
    I know the doctors on the scene said he could have made sure he was away from the flow of blood from the neck wounds,but surely his hands must have had blood etc on them when taking some of the organs etc.
    I am in the camp of a local man(poor man) but this thing about where does he get cleaned up realy does nag me.
    So does he wear gloves and just peels them off and dumps them somewhere?
    Does he have his own property,not a doss house resident?

    Sorry a bit long winded but i just cant get this ?? out of my head.
    Please any help

    Dixon9
    still learning
Working...
X