Surely it isn't stretching things too much to suspect that a Victorian woman in long-term cohabitation with a man named Kelly might have been known to some as Mrs Kelly?
							
						
					All Roads Lead to Dorset St.,
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
But she never didOriginally posted by MrBarnett View PostSurely it isn't stretching things too much to suspect that a Victorian woman in long-term cohabitation with a man named Kelly might have been known to some as Mrs Kelly?
Read Wilkinson's testimony and it makes it quite clear that Conway was the name she chose to go by using the phrase "bought and paid for" to emphasise the point
If others wanted to call her what they want due to her partner at the time that was their choice not hersYou can lead a horse to water.....
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Because there was a staircase, a stairwell and a landing in the way. And Prater said her room was above the shed - not straddling the shed, Kelly's room and the gap between them where the staircase started on the ground floor.Originally posted by Batman View Posthttps://whitechapeljack.com/wp-conte..._court_map.jpg
Look again at No. 20 (upstairs) Elizabeth Prater. Notice the 2 x ? that are there. One is above Kelly's room and the other is above the storage room. How do you know her room isn't partially over both?Yes - it was colloquially known as "the shed" to the residents, but it was not shed-like in its construction; it was a front room co-opted to act as a storage space for McCarthy's barrows. Furthermore, calling it "the shed" would not have made it "the only shed in Dorset Street".Either way, Prater said the shed was the room under her. So we know they are calling this storage room 'the shed'.Yes, and there are question marks on both arrows, indicating that either Prater's room was at the front over the "shed" (which it was) or it was at the back over Kelly's room (which it wasn't, because another report tells us that a couple lived there).One of those arrows points at the storage room. The other to MKs.
It's more of a shed than the front parlour of a domestic dwelling like 26 Dorset Street!While the stables is a good find, a stables isn't a shedWell, she wasn't telling the whole truth, was she, because she used a false name on the selfsame pawn ticket.and if she did stay there, then it is the only truth she told in among a list of lies. Why tell the truth about that and lie about everything else?Whichever way we cut it, it wasn't remotely spacious, that's for sure.Anyway, that storage room is much bigger than you are making it out to be.The article says that Eddowes was occasionally "compelled to share the nightly refuge - a shed in Dorset-street - of a score or so of houseless waifs, penniless prostitutes like herself, without a friend, a name, or even a nickname". (Daily Telegraph, 3rd October 1888)You are also going for the max number of 20 despite the journalist saying 10 to 20.
A "score or so" is "twenty or so". Plus, you can tell from that snippet that this article could well be just a bit of romantic Victorian schmaltz, and indeed the rest of it is written in the same melodramatic manner.Last edited by Sam Flynn; 10-05-2018, 05:22 AM.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Would depend on what they knew regarding the false nameOriginally posted by Batman View PostOkay, but do you think that not a single officer or investigator concerning themselves with these details didn't meet and question the very Mary Kelly who would become the very next victim of the same person that killed Eddowes?You can lead a horse to water.....
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
If she was so attached to the Conway name, why did she revert to her maiden name when in Wandsworth prison?Originally posted by packers stem View PostBut she never did
Read Wilkinson's testimony and it makes it quite clear that Conway was the name she chose to go by using the phrase "bought and paid for" to emphasise the point
If others wanted to call her what they want due to her partner at the time that was their choice not hers
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
She didn't tell the truth about anything at all, except to her partner. Nothing that was written down, nothing she said to officers, was the truth. Yet we are to believe she gave the right address to a stable in all of that?
26 Dorset St. is one figure less than the address she gave of 6 Dorset St. Just take away the 2 and we are talking about the room next to Kellys.
A woman whose name-like she happened to be using the day she was murdered.
Sam how many coincidences do you have going on there with your overall view of the case? Between rejecting Stride and Graffiti and now that Eddowes was staying in Miller's court, and the names Mary and Kelly being used, do you believe there are ANY connections in this case at all???Last edited by Batman; 10-05-2018, 05:29 AM.Bona fide canonical and then some.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Even if they identified her as Eddowes right at the start, why should that prevent them from finding a Mary Kelly on Dorset Street given they have this evidence? How do they know she isn't a real person?Originally posted by packers stem View PostWould depend on what they knew regarding the false name
Furthermore, isn't it very odd that investigators, even after discovering Kelly's body and investigating it, aren't discussing these connecting factors much, if at all?Last edited by Batman; 10-05-2018, 05:32 AM.Bona fide canonical and then some.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
The problem is that Eddowes can be associated with at least two false names/addresses: Jane Kelly of 6 Dorset Street, and Mary Ann Kelly of 6 Fashion Street. Chances are that neither of these women really existed, so the police wouldn't have got very far. They probably realised that they were false names and addresses from the get-go.Originally posted by Batman View PostOkay, but do you think that not a single officer or investigator concerning themselves with these details didn't meet and question the very Mary Kelly who would become the very next victim of the same person that killed Eddowes?Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Let's say you are right and they didn't think anything of it then.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostThe problem is that Eddowes can be associated with at least two false names/addresses: Jane Kelly of 6 Dorset Street, and Mary Ann Kelly of 6 Fashion Street. Chances are that neither of these women really existed, so the police wouldn't have got very far. They probably realised that they were false names and addresses from the get-go.
Why aren't they thinking something of it AFTER Mary Kelly of Miller's Court, Dorset street is murdered?
We certainly are.Bona fide canonical and then some.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Originally posted by Batman View PostLet's say you are right and they didn't think anything of it then.
Why aren't they thinking something of it AFTER Mary Kelly of Miller's Court, Dorset street is murdered?
We certainly are.
"In a BBC interview in 1973, an elderly nun at the refuge claimed that she had been a novice there in 1915 and was told by an old sister who was there in 1888 that "if it had not been for the Kelly woman, none of the murders would have happened"
Mary Kelly's murder put an end to the murders.
Doubt it was the big secret most think it was.
Providence Row was originally a stable in Finsbury Square that was used for homeless women and children, which was relocated to Crispin Street in 1868.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
All roads lead to Dorset St.,Originally posted by DJA View Post"In a BBC interview in 1973, an elderly nun at the refuge claimed that she had been a novice there in 1915 and was told by an old sister who was there in 1888 that "if it had not been for the Kelly woman, none of the murders would have happened"
Mary Kelly's murder put an end to the murders.
Doubt it was the big secret most think it was.Bona fide canonical and then some.
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
But she gave the wrong name on that pawn ticket and, in similar vein to her having plucked a familiar surname (that of her partner) out of the air, there's no reason why a familiar address wouldn't have popped into her head as well.Originally posted by Batman View PostShe didn't tell the truth about anything at all, except to her partner. Nothing that was written down, nothing she said to officers, was the truth. Yet we are to believe she gave the right address to a stable in all of that?There were a number 16 and 36 Dorset Street as well, so we can't just say "add a 2" because doing so would fit in with a preconceived notion that McCarthy's shed must somehow have been "the" shed referred to in the Telegraph of October 3rd.26 Dorset St. is one figure less than the address she gave of 6 Dorset St. Just take away the 2 and we are talking about the room next to Kellys.
At least we know that 6 Dorset Street backed onto stables, which are shed-like of their very nature, and have a track record of providing accommodation to desperate nomads going all the way back to the birth of Jesus. Not that I'm saying that these stables were the "shed" referred to in the Eddowes newspaper report, only that (a) stables resemble sheds more than domestic front rooms do; and (b) these particular stables coincide with an address that Eddowes actually gave.
A combination of a very common forename (Jane, not Mary or Mary Jane for that matter) and her partner's surname. No more remarkable than a man choosing "Dave Smith" or "Jim Jones".A woman whose name-like she happened to be using the day she was murdered.
They're all easily explained without stretching credulity in any way, so I'm not in the least bit fazed by their coinciding.Sam how many coincidences do you have going on there with your overall view of the case? Between rejecting Stride and Graffiti and now that Eddowes was staying in Miller's court, and the names Mary and Kelly being used, do you believe there are ANY connections in this case at all???
As to "now that Eddowes was staying in Miller's court", it's yet to be proven that the shed referred to in the DT of 3rd October was McCarthy's "shed" at all, and - given that we know that it was McCarthy's barrow depot - it seems very unlikely that it was.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Reckon the story goes back to the 1860s when Mary Ann Kelly was a child.Originally posted by Batman View PostAll roads lead to Dorset St.,
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Let's be precise. I was Mary Jane (or Marie Jeanette) Kelly who was killed at Miller's Court, 26 Dorset Street. Eddowes' false names referred to Jane Kelly of 6 Dorset Street, and Mary ANN Kelly of 6 Fashion Street.Originally posted by Batman View PostLet's say you are right and they didn't think anything of it then.
Why aren't they thinking something of it AFTER Mary Kelly of Miller's Court, Dorset street is murdered?Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
It is not very precise if nobody can find any record of Mary Jane Kelly before her murder.Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostLet's be precise. I was Mary Jane (or Marie Jeanette) Kelly who was killed at Miller's Court, 26 Dorset Street. Eddowes' false names referred to Jane Kelly of 6 Dorset Street, and Mary ANN Kelly of 6 Fashion Street.
Comment
 

Comment