Originally posted by jerryd
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Blood oozing
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by jerryd View PostHi Steve,
In one report the wound was said to be "deep and wide" in Alice's case. Add to that fact, her head was turned "sharply" to the right which would open up the wound for a more unrestricted blood flow. In other words, if her head were turned the other way (to the left) it would have pinched the wound closed.
However it would appear to be far less severe a wound than Nichols.
And thats the issue, resulting in a longer time to bleed out.
However I must be getting old and past my bedtime as my choice of words over the last hour or so as not been great.
Cheers
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostLet's be very careful about the actual words here. The Mackenzie wound is much smaller than the one to Nichols.
In the Mackenzie case the neck is not cut all round and no-one would I think call it "gaping."
In the Nichols case, some have in the past call it "gaping", The wound certainly encircled most of the neck. So the possability must exist that it may have been.
However without a clear indication as to the exact postition and angle of the head to the neck; we do not know if it was "gaping" or not. It's just a possability.
The evidence certainly does not suggest it is what was seen.
It was certainly a more open wound than that to Mackenzie.
Of course what is "gaping open" to one may just be a large deep wound to another.
Steve
In one report the wound was said to be "deep and wide" in Alice's case. Add to that fact, her head was turned "sharply" to the right which would open up the wound for a more unrestricted blood flow. In other words, if her head were turned the other way (to the left) it would have pinched the wound closed.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostBut they spoke English though didn't they Paul?
Do you think they regarded "almost immediately" as synonymous with "instantaneous"?
Paul
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostAre you suggesting that there is any evidence that the neck wound in the case of Nichols was "gaping open"?
In the Mackenzie case the neck is not cut all round and no-one would I think call it "gaping."
In the Nichols case, some have in the past call it "gaping", The wound certainly encircled most of the neck. So the possability must exist that it may have been.
However without a clear indication as to the exact postition and angle of the head to the neck; we do not know if it was "gaping" or not. It's just a possability.
The evidence certainly does not suggest it is what was seen.
It was certainly a more open wound than that to Mackenzie.
Of course what is "gaping open" to one may just be a large deep wound to another.
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostDo you actually mean "died" later than what we have been told?
Here is the evidence on timings from the inquest:
PC Joseph Allen: Was told by Sgt Badlam at "five minutes to 1" that a woman had been found murdered in Castle Alley.
PC Andrews: "About ten minutes to 1" was at corner of Old Castle Street leading into Castle Alley then proceeded up Castle Alley, trying some doors in the alley, when he noticed a woman lying on the pavement.
Isaac Jacobs: Left his home in Newcastle Place, which overlooked Castle Street, at "about ten minutes to 1" and when he arrived at "Cocoanut Place" was told by a constable (Andrews) that a murder had been committed.
PS Badham: Was in Castle Street at "about 12 minutes to 1" then walked to Pell Lane where he heard two blows from a whistle indicating that the body had been found.
PC Neve: Met Sergeant Badham in Commercial street at "about 5 minutes to 1" when he was told that a murder had been committed.
Catherine Hughes, local resident, said that it rained at 12.45. Inspector Reid said he was certain it was not raining at 12.30. The pavement beneath the body was dry.
No, I meant she was attacked, had her neck cut, and died later than 12:40. I'd be happy to discuss my reasoning, but I don't want to detract from this thread.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Postwound not gaping open, so there is some restriction on the blood loss.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kjab3112 View PostWe are referring to medical men operating in a time before resuscitation.
Do you think they regarded "almost immediately" as synonymous with "instantaneous"?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostStill, 12.55 to 1:10 = 15 minutes.
And of course how accurate is Phillips time of arrival. Equally important how synchronized are the time of the police and Phillips.
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jerryd View PostIn the case of Alice McKenzie, I personally feel she was murdered later than what we have been told.
Here is the evidence on timings from the inquest:
PC Joseph Allen: Was told by Sgt Badlam at "five minutes to 1" that a woman had been found murdered in Castle Alley.
PC Andrews: "About ten minutes to 1" was at corner of Old Castle Street leading into Castle Alley then proceeded up Castle Alley, trying some doors in the alley, when he noticed a woman lying on the pavement.
Isaac Jacobs: Left his home in Newcastle Place, which overlooked Castle Street, at "about ten minutes to 1" and when he arrived at "Cocoanut Place" was told by a constable (Andrews) that a murder had been committed.
PS Badham: Was in Castle Street at "about 12 minutes to 1" then walked to Pell Lane where he heard two blows from a whistle indicating that the body had been found.
PC Neve: Met Sergeant Badham in Commercial street at "about 5 minutes to 1" when he was told that a murder had been committed.
Catherine Hughes, local resident, said that it rained at 12.45. Inspector Reid said he was certain it was not raining at 12.30. The pavement beneath the body was dry.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostWhere does the word "instantaneous" come from?
Are "almost immediately" and "instantaneous" synonyms then?
Paul
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jerryd View PostWhen Sgt, Herwin/Irwin arrived at 12:55ish he stated "she must have been killed a few minutes before".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View PostI've heard it suggested that, if the throat was cut right round (thus severing both vagus nerves) then the heart would stop beating immediately. Which may explain the doctors' statements. And affect the blood loss. If it's true, that is.... can any medical types confirm?
Paul
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John G View PostI very much doubt that death would have been instantaneous: see, for example, http://realfighting.com/unconsciousness_and_death.php
Are "almost immediately" and "instantaneous" synonyms then?
Leave a comment:
-
In the case of Alice McKenzie, I personally feel she was murdered later than what we have been told. Witnesses such as Isaac Lewis Jacobs and PC Andrews describe the wounds with a strong flow of blood when they saw her. They use the terms "running" (Andrews) and running very fast, spurting and gushing (Jacobs). In fact several papers after interviewing Jacobs stated his testimony indicated that the heart was still beating when he saw her. He (Jacobs) would have arrived at the scene approximately between 12:52 and 12:55 a.m. If Jacobs is right and blood was spurting, that would indicate the heart was still beating. That would also indicate PC Andrews would have witnessed an even greater event two minutes earlier regarding the flow of blood. When Sgt, Herwin/Irwin arrived at 12:55ish he stated "she must have been killed a few minutes before".
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: