Pc Long and the piece of rag.

[John G]

You asked me for a source.

Have you provided one?

[Pierre]

You pick up on "always" but not on the notion that "Quarter of a mile" means "Millers Court"???!!!

Of course I do. Why the "always"? What sort of assumption is it?

If there is peace and quiet in a city, and suddenly a bomb hits it, has the bomb been there all the time?

[Pierre]

Have you provided one?

The inquest source(s) for the GSG. The reports for the GSG. There you see the variation.

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=John G;394824]

Who?

Yes, John. That is the most important thing.

It is in the MO, it is in the signature, it is in the victimology.

It is there in the sources.

It lasted for a period in history, and then it went away.

It is in this time period, day by day. And he tried to explain it.

[John G]

The inquest source(s) for the GSG. The reports for the GSG. There you see the variation.

Is this relevant? How do you know it's relevant?

[David Orsam]

Of course I do. Why the "always"? What sort of assumption is it?

That's not a proper response to my post. I was commenting that you picked up on "always" BUT NOT on "Quarter of a mile" meaning "Millers Court".

If "Quarter of a mile" doesn't mean "Millers Court", and it doesn't, then we don't need to worry about "always" do we?

[John G]

[QUOTE=Pierre;394829]

Yes, John. That is the most important thing.

It is in the MO, it is in the signature, it is in the victimology.

It is there in the sources.

Not that I've noticed. Are we, perchance, being metaphorical again?

[Pierre]

Is this relevant? How do you know it's relevant?

What do you mean by relevant in this case?

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=John G;394832]

Not that I've noticed. Are we, perchance, being metaphorical again?

Trees fall in the woods even when you do not see them fall, John. Sorry. I see them.

And I am not metaphorical.

[John G]

[QUOTE=Pierre;394829]

Yes, John. That is the most important thing.

It is in the MO, it is in the signature, it is in the victimology.

It is there in the sources.

It lasted for a period in history, and then it went away.

It is in this time period, day by day. And he tried to explain it.

That's very poetical, Pierre.

[John G]

[QUOTE=Pierre;394834]

Trees fall in the woods even when you do not see them fall, John. Sorry. I see them.

Are you a seer, perchance?

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=John G;394835]

That's very poetical, Pierre.

Well, that is how I understand this case.

[David Orsam]

What do you mean by relevant in this case?

In case it helps:

relevant a. bearing on or pertinent to the matter in hand.

[John G]

In case it helps:

relevant a. bearing on or pertinent to the matter in hand.

Thank you, David, much obliged!

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=John G;394836]

Are you a seer, perchance?

Letīs stick to the normal discussion.