Evidence Caring

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Heissenberg
    Cadet
    • Aug 2016
    • 4

    #1

    Evidence Caring

    This is my first thread on this incredible site as I'm a newbie and I'm quite asking for your 'expertise' to be able to explain something that really disturbed me during my investigation on the topic.

    Might have been a deliberate evidence destruction on JTR case? Places, evidences, clues, ...

    Most important streets related to JTR crimes have changed their names or even destroyed or dissapeared. I don't really know if there's any bigger reason than JTR to visit Whitechapel nowadays so that's at least a very strange movement for a country known by keeping tradition instead of destructing it.

    A lot of evidences have been lost through the years (victims possessions, stuff in MJK murder scene, clothes, bed sheets,..., letters received by police and media,...) and today there's almost nothing to analyze with modern technologies.

    Is it possible that there were no real intentions to solve the case?.

    Thanks in advance for your thoughts and opinions.
  • Abby Normal
    Commissioner
    • Jun 2010
    • 11939

    #2
    Originally posted by Heissenberg View Post
    This is my first thread on this incredible site as I'm a newbie and I'm quite asking for your 'expertise' to be able to explain something that really disturbed me during my investigation on the topic.

    Might have been a deliberate evidence destruction on JTR case? Places, evidences, clues, ...

    Most important streets related to JTR crimes have changed their names or even destroyed or dissapeared. I don't really know if there's any bigger reason than JTR to visit Whitechapel nowadays so that's at least a very strange movement for a country known by keeping tradition instead of destructing it.

    A lot of evidences have been lost through the years (victims possessions, stuff in MJK murder scene, clothes, bed sheets,..., letters received by police and media,...) and today there's almost nothing to analyze with modern technologies.

    Is it possible that there were no real intentions to solve the case?.

    Thanks in advance for your thoughts and opinions.
    no way
    "Is all that we see or seem
    but a dream within a dream?"

    -Edgar Allan Poe


    "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
    quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

    -Frederick G. Abberline

    Comment

    • Fisherman
      Cadet
      • Feb 2008
      • 23676

      #3
      Iīm gonna have to agree with Abby here, Heissenberg - I donīt think it is a realistic suggestion. As for the murder places, I think no country would proudly display sites where their citizens were cut to pieces by a coldblooded killer. If anything, most countries would be pleased to see those spots go away.
      Itīs another matter that ripperologists would prefer the spots to stay untouched. I think we are the exemptions, not the rule, in that respect.
      Last edited by Fisherman; 09-02-2016, 07:13 AM.

      Comment

      • Pierre
        Inactive
        • Sep 2015
        • 4407

        #4
        Originally posted by Heissenberg View Post
        This is my first thread on this incredible site as I'm a newbie and I'm quite asking for your 'expertise' to be able to explain something that really disturbed me during my investigation on the topic.

        Might have been a deliberate evidence destruction on JTR case? Places, evidences, clues, ...

        Most important streets related to JTR crimes have changed their names or even destroyed or dissapeared. I don't really know if there's any bigger reason than JTR to visit Whitechapel nowadays so that's at least a very strange movement for a country known by keeping tradition instead of destructing it.

        A lot of evidences have been lost through the years (victims possessions, stuff in MJK murder scene, clothes, bed sheets,..., letters received by police and media,...) and today there's almost nothing to analyze with modern technologies.

        Is it possible that there were no real intentions to solve the case?.

        Thanks in advance for your thoughts and opinions.
        It is possible that evidence has been put away in a box at Scotland Yard.

        Comment

        • GUT
          Commissioner
          • Jan 2014
          • 7841

          #5
          Welcome to casebook.

          No way.
          G U T

          There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

          Comment

          • Paddy
            Sergeant
            • Jul 2009
            • 842

            #6
            More likely those items in the box got taken home gradually and kept by people Pierre?

            Comment

            • DJA
              *
              • May 2015
              • 4700

              #7
              Originally posted by Heissenberg View Post

              Is it possible that there were no real intentions to solve the case?.

              Thanks in advance for your thoughts and opinions.
              Yep. Big cover up.

              Ask yourself why Abberline was called in so quickly after Nichols was killed.

              Look carefully at the investigations of Eddowes and Kelly's deaths.

              It's a bad joke.

              You may gets thoughts and opinions here,however most of it is simply a rehash.

              Welcome to the nightmare

              Comment

              • DJA
                *
                • May 2015
                • 4700

                #8
                Originally posted by Pierre View Post
                It is possible that evidence has been put away in a box at Scotland Yard.
                Think it was a jar actually

                Comment

                • Varqm
                  Inspector
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 1130

                  #9
                  Back then there were no fingerprints and dna, so if they had a bloodied rug for ex. what are they gonna do with it? A lot of the evidence were useless.They also did not find it important to take lots of photographs of the murder scene - now it's mandatory maybe including a video.
                  Also the above might have caused some negligence - if it's useless why bother.They had policemen in Goulston St. and despite them staring at it,they had several versions of the graffito .
                  Clearly the first human laws (way older and already established) spawned organized religion's morality - from which it's writers only copied/stole,ex. you cannot kill,rob,steal (forced,it started civil society).
                  M. Pacana

                  Comment

                  • GUT
                    Commissioner
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 7841

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                    More likely those items in the box got taken home gradually and kept by people Pierre?
                    Yep..
                    G U T

                    There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                    Comment

                    • Michael W Richards
                      Inactive
                      • May 2012
                      • 7122

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Heissenberg View Post

                      Is it possible that there were no real intentions to solve the case?.
                      Is it possible that there was no real "Ripper" case to solve at all? Yes to your and my question.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X