Independant re-examination and forensic testing of the Swanson Marginalia?

[Phil Carter]

Hello all,

This is a poll to ask who would be in favour of a new up to date independant handwriting and annotation re-examination and forensic testing of the Swanson marginalia, in order to ascertain it's complete authenticity.
The poll will be anonymous, so that anyone wishing to air their opinion but remain unknown, may do so.

best wishes

Phil

[Chris]

Isn't this a bit like asking whether people are in favour of motherhood and apple pie? A better question might have been "Do you think there is any need for ..."

[Trevor Marriott]

Isn't this a bit like asking whether people are in favour of motherhood and apple pie? A better question might have been "Do you think there is any need for ..."

Although the voting is anonymous its quiet clear who the one is so far who has voted against

[Chris]

Although the voting is anonymous its quiet clear who the one is so far who has voted against

If you mean me, you're wrong. I haven't voted, for the reason I gave.

[Trevor Marriott]

If you mean me, you're wrong. I haven't voted, for the reason I gave.

There you go you huff and puff on here and sit on the fence and when given the opportunity to air your views what do you, worry about semantics.

You have been sitting on the fence for so long I am surprised you havent got splinters in your backside.

[Phil Carter]

Hello Chris,

The actual poll question is "Do you wish to see... "

If one thinks there is a need for this, then the answer is yes, one does wish to see this happen. Conversely, if one does not think there is a need, then one doesn't wish to see it occur.

It's just a simple yes or no. How I worded the poll question was with that in mind.

I could of used "Are you in favour of.."
I could of used "Is there, in your opinion, a need for..."
I could have used "Is it right to ask for, in your view..."

I happened to ask.. "Do you wish to see..."

Just a simple yes, or no. Thats all.

best wishes

Phil

[Chris]

Trevor

No, I'm not "sitting on the fence" at all.

I don't have any real doubt that the marginalia are exactly what they appear to be, I don't think any further testing is necessary, and I don't think the endless unevidenced suggestions to the contrary are at all fair to the Swanson family.

I hope that's clear enough for you.

[Chris]

If one thinks there is a need for this, then the answer is yes, one does wish to see this happen. Conversely, if one does not think there is a need, then one doesn't wish to see it occur.

Thanks. Then my vote will be a "No."

[Phil Carter]

Hello Chris,

Thank you for your participation.

best wishes

Phil

[Trevor Marriott]

Trevor

No, I'm not "sitting on the fence" at all.

I don't have any real doubt that the marginalia are exactly what they appear to be, I don't think any further testing is necessary, and I don't think the endless unevidenced suggestions to the contrary are at all fair to the Swanson family.

I hope that's clear enough for you.

Thank you for making your position clear and can I ask where you stand as far Kosminski is concerned and the suggestion that he was the ripper ?

[Chris]

Thank you for making your position clear and can I ask where you stand as far Kosminski is concerned and the suggestion that he was the ripper ?

Surely there's no secret about that. I believe Aaron Kozminski is unlikely to have been the Ripper. And I think the same about all the named suspects.

[Trevor Marriott]

Surely there's no secret about that. I believe Aaron Kozminski is unlikely to have been the Ripper. And I think the same about all the named suspects.

What about the suspect Kozminski spelt with and "S"

[Chris]

What about the suspect Kozminski spelt with and "S"

As I said, the same goes for all the named suspects as far as I'm concerned.

[Monty]

Although the voting is anonymous its quiet clear who the one is so far who has voted against

Who Trevor?

Come on, name names....or you'd you rather not?

Monty

[Trevor Marriott]

Who Trevor?

Come on, name names....or you'd you rather not?

Monty

That seems to be your answer to a number or both current and recent post on here.