Just wondering does anyone who understands ai think that it can solve the mystery
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AI and the case
Collapse
X
-
Good question Woo , I guess for me, given the current topic on the boards atm in regards to suspect scoring , a list of AI,s top suspects based on what is known would indeed be interesting .'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
-
Originally posted by thewoo1 View Postjust something I thought a computer game I think has ai......remember sherlock holmes v jack the ripper.....it gave a definitive ripper suspect from the list......coincidence?......on youtube one can watch entire walkthrough.......
Welcome to the madhouse.
My understanding of AI is that it is the ultimate deployment of logical deduction. Unfortunately human beings are more prone to the stupidity principle than to logic, as evidenced by recent political developments. The computer game logically picked Levy as the Ripper, but in a chaotic world these principles may not necessarily apply.
Cheers, GeorgeLast edited by GBinOz; Today, 04:31 AM.The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
Solve the case, no.
Teach people about the case, absolutely.
More generally, I find great value in the reconstructions of the crime scenes, the way the general area looked, etc. Most of this is the hard work of individuals, but AI could play a role in this. And these reconstructions could trigger insight that may generate new theories.
Comment
-
No. AI is way over-hyped in its abilities. It does not understand the meaning, it only evaluates Grammer, and looks for key words. I tell my students how, if I enter exam questions into things like ChatGPT, it produces answers that fail for this reason. It just grabs a few key words, and then searches for related text, tries to build a response by what shows up most, and as a result misses the point entirely.
Computers are very good at some things, but abstract reasoning isn't one of them.
- Jeff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DJA View PostRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment