Originally posted by Stewart P Evans
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Suppose a City PC did see something near Mitre Square
Collapse
X
-
It's not a 'half-remembered rumor'.
Macnaghaten had written a second version of his 'Report' in which a PC sees maybe 'Kosminski' with Eddowes. Major Griffiths utilized this in his account in 'Mysteries of Police and Crime' (1898).
It certainly beefed up that suspect; that he might have been seen with a victim. And it placed this suspect, by implication, inside the 1888 police investigation (as opposed to only being learned about after he was sectioned over two years later).
And then the toothpaste was somewhat awkwardly squeezed back into the tube.
In 1907, Sims writes that the policeman saw a figure who might have been the Polish suspect leaving the scene of the crime, rather than speaking to the victim. Later the Bobbie looked again at this suspect (wow!) and thought there was some features of outline which matched but nothing stronger.
By 1914, Macnaghten totally downgrades the cop sighting--who is reportedly the only significant witness--as maybe, possibly, probably not seeing Jack; it was unsatisfying.
Take that, Anderson!
Comment
-
Jonathan
So, it was a lie deliberately propagated by Macnaghten to throw people off the scent to protect the continued innocence of young Montague, as the Druitts were essential to the maintenance of the Conservative regime.
And others - including experienced policemen -merely unwittingly repeated Macnaghten's crafty lie?
That is your suggestion isn't it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Damaso.
"Watkins approached the square from the north, right?"
Not if he came in through Mitre st, as he said.
Cheers.
LC
If you had just committed a murder in Mitre Square and were carrying organs, would you flee south, towards presumably the busiest street?
Comment
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Stewart. Had Watkins seen someone exit Mitre sq, and had not testified to that effect at inquest, would that not have been grounds for immediate dismissal?
But he was not dismissed. Therefore, it seems that he did not come forward with a sighting after the fact.
Cheers.
LC
In 1888, would it be plausible for Watkins's superiors to tell him NOT to discuss his sighting or tell the inquest?
Comment
-
Person doing this is obviously disturbed in the mind to what degree we will never know .We do have to keep this in mind when trying to make sense of the killers behaviour before and after murderThree things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
well known
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostRecollections of Det. Insp. Robert Sagar, City of London Police.
As you know, the perpetrator of these outrages was never brought to justice, but I believe he came the nearest to being captured after the murder of the woman Kelly in Mitre-square. A police officer met a well-known man of Jewish appearance coming out of the court near the square, and a few moments after fell over the body. He blew his whistle, and other officers running up, they set off in pursuit of the man who had just left. The officers were wearing indiarubber boots, and the retreating footsteps of a man could be clearly heard. The sounds were followed to King's-block in the model dwellings in Stoney-lane, but we did not see the man again that night.
Daily News, 9 Jan. 1905.Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
conundrum
Hello Damaso. Thanks.
"If you had just committed a murder in Mitre Square and were carrying organs, would you flee south, towards presumably the busiest street?"
Certainly not. For, besides the busy street, if I knew the lay out, I'd know that Watkins would soon be there.
But neither would I head through Church Passage and run bang into Harvey.
And, a fortiori, neither would I go through St. James and risk meeting Blenkingsop and the volunteer lads.
So . . . conundrum?
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
Originally posted by crberger View Postseriously, COULD it have been a well-known foreigner, but not Jewish? Thus the description?
Well-known in terms of suspicious criminal activity or reprobate?Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
Comment