Dear all,
Don Rumbelow speculated that, and bear in mind he was an ex city PC himself, Watkins was in fact drinking tea with the ex PC security guard at K+T's. This was almost confirmed when the Stephen White story came to light in which, if I remember correctly, it says that a PC came out of the room he had been in and discovered the body. Or words to that effect, haven't got my stuff with me!
If true, we can see why the Police may need to keep this info quiet. If the public found out that the Ripper was given a helping hand by beat officers scrimping on their rounds, there would be uproar. Presumably, most PC's had done so at one time or another so within the force Watkins may have been forgiven.
On the other hand, unless I've missed something if you take away Swanson's reference to the witness being Jewish, there is nothing to believe that it could be Watkins is there?
It would be easy for the Police to keep quiet that he had actually seen the killer. Only a handful need know and a strictly verbal basis would mean no written records?
regards,
Don Rumbelow speculated that, and bear in mind he was an ex city PC himself, Watkins was in fact drinking tea with the ex PC security guard at K+T's. This was almost confirmed when the Stephen White story came to light in which, if I remember correctly, it says that a PC came out of the room he had been in and discovered the body. Or words to that effect, haven't got my stuff with me!
If true, we can see why the Police may need to keep this info quiet. If the public found out that the Ripper was given a helping hand by beat officers scrimping on their rounds, there would be uproar. Presumably, most PC's had done so at one time or another so within the force Watkins may have been forgiven.
On the other hand, unless I've missed something if you take away Swanson's reference to the witness being Jewish, there is nothing to believe that it could be Watkins is there?
It would be easy for the Police to keep quiet that he had actually seen the killer. Only a handful need know and a strictly verbal basis would mean no written records?
regards,
Comment