If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hi Neil. I'm not sure what Stephen means, due to his proverbial laconism.
Could this refer to Macnaghten "5 victims only" ?
But there again, the Grainger episode proves they didn't "know" that the man was under lock and key.
"The same can be asked about uncaught multiple single murderers."
Perhaps, perhaps not. According to my pre-med students and rumours amongst nurses, we would be astonished at the numbers of seriously infirm/terminally ill who are quietly done for by family members, medical people, etc.
Not to mention husbands who do for their wives--wrong medicine, "household accidents," etc. Many an old Alfred Hitchcock yarn involved this motif.
Hello Caroline. I am suggesting that it was figured out later.
Cheers.
LC
Yes, but how could it be 'figured out' at all, when nobody had seen a killer in action, no incriminating evidence was ever found, no credible confession ever obtained...etc etc
Solutions in a murder case can't be 'figured out' like a maths equation.
The very best we could expect is that someone thought they had a solution, ie they thought they had figured it out, ie they thought they knew.
Hello Caroline. I understand your position. And, yes, one could THINK the case solved. Then, such a supposed solution either was congruent with the case or it was not.
Congruent? Geometry? Ah, math! Maybe it works after all? (heh-heh)
It'd be funny to have a movie with a clever Inspector (not Abberline, therefore) investigating the ripper murders and being more and more convinced, murder after murder, that there is no serial killer around.
Too bad Peter Sellers is dead.
I probably did, Jon. And knowing Ivor, he'd have given me a mouthful for my pains.
Trouble is, it applies to everyone who thinks they have cracked the case, whether they have a lone predator in mind or several individuals, each with different reasons for wanting to snuff out a specific Spitalfields unfortunate.
Without the kind of evidence that could have resulted in an actual conviction, all attempts to 'figure out' a solution will always remain just attempts, bolstered only by personal conviction.
Love,
Caz
X
"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
I cannot be 100% sure about anything in this case, but you do pose a question that leaves open questions upon which ever side one would choose to answer. Very nicely done.
It is not in the heart that hate begins but in the mind of those that seek the revenge of creation. Darrel Derek Stieben
As an item of fringe interest, I could of course offer the fact that when prime minister Palme was shot in 1986, one of the leading police investigators actually produced not one but TWO (2) "police solutions". Both Victor Gunnarsson and Christer Petterson were favoured by him, and he thought it a shame that the police was not able to put at least one of them away for the hit, apparently regardless of whom!
It makes me wonder how much stock we should invest in "police solutions" - some of them seem more directed to saving the behinds of the police than to finding the true culprit.
Comment