Much appreciated Neil.
Don't trouble yourself on my account for the Divisional Inspectors at King David Lane, or Arbour Sq.
I mention them just by way of completing the picture. We have no correspondence throughout the Whitechapel Murders from these stations. My interest was only really Leman St. & Comm. St.
Ok, I think you threw an extra "Chief" in there
Simon's list described Ellisdon as, Divisional Inspector, which is what I had expected to see four of.
Four Divisional Inspectors, one for each of the four stations - thats what I was originally looking for.
Interesting that some correspondence - example: a couple written by Sgt White, or Inspector Moore, were submitted to F.G. Abberline (CID), yet below his name is written Supt. Arnold (Met).
This suggests to me that the writer has submitted a copy to both officials, Abberline at CID and Arnold at Leman St.?
Parallel paths of communication?
In other cases we have Inspr. Moore, who was CID, write a report which was signed by Supd. Arnold, who was Met.
The reason, I assume, is because this report was written at Leman St. Alternately we then have Swanson write his cover report on the same subject (John Cleary), but his report was signed by his own superior, John Shore Supt.
Many thanks, Jon S.
Don't trouble yourself on my account for the Divisional Inspectors at King David Lane, or Arbour Sq.
I mention them just by way of completing the picture. We have no correspondence throughout the Whitechapel Murders from these stations. My interest was only really Leman St. & Comm. St.
Originally posted by Monty
View Post
Simon's list described Ellisdon as, Divisional Inspector, which is what I had expected to see four of.
Four Divisional Inspectors, one for each of the four stations - thats what I was originally looking for.
Interesting that some correspondence - example: a couple written by Sgt White, or Inspector Moore, were submitted to F.G. Abberline (CID), yet below his name is written Supt. Arnold (Met).
This suggests to me that the writer has submitted a copy to both officials, Abberline at CID and Arnold at Leman St.?
Parallel paths of communication?
In other cases we have Inspr. Moore, who was CID, write a report which was signed by Supd. Arnold, who was Met.
The reason, I assume, is because this report was written at Leman St. Alternately we then have Swanson write his cover report on the same subject (John Cleary), but his report was signed by his own superior, John Shore Supt.
Many thanks, Jon S.
Comment