Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blurred

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geddy2112
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post

    The stairwell. Sitting down.

    Regards, Pierre
    Please do not misquote me. I did not say that. That was in a reply to my comments.

    You are being rather ambiguous to say the least, as usual I note you rarely answer questions asked (not answered mine on left handedness) and seem to have 'your' theory (which you will not divulge) and go around making obscure threads to drop hints, or dare I say it gain attention.

    What's your game?
    Last edited by Geddy2112; 04-21-2016, 01:49 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by Mayerling View Post
    Djew or Djuwe really believe "jwhoever" was pronounced that way?
    In "Psmith Journalist" or "Psmith In the City", P.G. Wodehouse has his hero explain the "P" at the start of his last name as like the "p" in "pshrimp".

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaggyrand View Post
    He wanted to be more comfortable when condemning the judges or Jews or juewes or jewels (merchants maybe?) or jwhoever. Why do you think he brought the bit of apron along? It wasn't to clean himself, it was so his poor bum wouldn't get cold on the step.
    Djew or Djuwe really believe "jwhoever" was pronounced that way?

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaggyrand View Post
    He wanted to be more comfortable when condemning the judges or Jews or juewes or jewels (merchants maybe?) or jwhoever. Why do you think he brought the bit of apron along? It wasn't to clean himself, it was so his poor bum wouldn't get cold on the step.
    Or maybe to blur the chalk with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaggyrand
    replied
    Originally posted by Rosella View Post
    Why would someone sit down to chalk a message on a wall? It seems rather an awkward way of doing it, to me.
    He wanted to be more comfortable when condemning the judges or Jews or juewes or jewels (merchants maybe?) or jwhoever. Why do you think he brought the bit of apron along? It wasn't to clean himself, it was so his poor bum wouldn't get cold on the step.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rosella
    replied
    Well, I'm a lefty and I don't smudge my writing, or at least I haven't since childhood, when, incidentally, I learned to write with a nibbed pen and an ink well, like the Victorians.
    Having said that, chalk is notorious for smudging at just the slightest touch, whether you're left or right handed . If the GSG WAS smudged it's odd that it's not mentioned anywhere that we know of besides Swanson's report.
    Why would someone sit down to chalk a message on a wall? It seems rather an awkward way of doing it, to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    [QUOTE=Errata;377955]
    Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

    My left handed physics teacher was a nightmare, erased half of what he wrote. So there is a little merit in what Pierre says. But that really only applies when you are writing at eye level. When you write at chest level, you don't rest your hand against the surface at all. So unless the lefty was also about 4 1/2 foot tall, it doesn't really apply.
    The stairwell. Sitting down.

    Regards, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    [QUOTE=Geddy2112;377950]
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post

    Are you suggesting the writer of the GSG was left handed and thus the killer was left handed due to smudging???

    Funny enough I've been left handed all my life and as far as I know not smudged any writing. I've also used 'chalk boards' a lot in teaching and never smudged either. I actually think the technique employed writing on a vertical plane is different to writing on a horizontal one. I find it difficult to write on a vertical surface with the edge of my hand resting on the 'board' hence making smudging impossible.
    My left handed physics teacher was a nightmare, erased half of what he wrote. So there is a little merit in what Pierre says. But that really only applies when you are writing at eye level. When you write at chest level, you don't rest your hand against the surface at all. So unless the lefty was also about 4 1/2 foot tall, it doesn't really apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Does anyone have any idea what he is on about this time?
    I'm assuming he's trying to explain why the police couldn't decipher the writing on the wall correctly, reading "Juwes" instead of "Judges". He is, I think, suggesting the writing was accidentally smudged or blurred by the author when writing it, making it hard to read.

    But who knows.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geddy2112
    replied
    [QUOTE=Pierre;377938]Are you suggesting the writer of the GSG was left handed and thus the killer was left handed due to smudging???

    Funny enough I've been left handed all my life and as far as I know not smudged any writing. I've also used 'chalk boards' a lot in teaching and never smudged either. I actually think the technique employed writing on a vertical plane is different to writing on a horizontal one. I find it difficult to write on a vertical surface with the edge of my hand resting on the 'board' hence making smudging impossible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    [QUOTE=Pierre;377946]
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post

    He is writing with his left hand.

    Pierre

    Your point?

    How do you link left hand to blurred writing.

    Steve
    Last edited by Elamarna; 04-20-2016, 02:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Does anyone have any idea what he is on about this time?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    [QUOTE=Elamarna;377944]
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post

    Dear Pierre

    what is that meant to show us, one can write with either hand without smudging the material used.
    Its quite easy.

    if the writing was burred, it is highly likely that it had been in place for sometime. Indeed one of the arguments used by those who believe that the GSG is related to the murders is that if it was old, it would either have been rubbed out or been smudged. they argue that the witnesses to the GSG do not say it was smudged, and therefore it is fresh; of course the witness do not say it was not blurred or smudged either.

    s
    He is writing with his left hand.

    Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    I blame the Judges

    When you add the blurred writing to the poor eyesight of the detectives it all adds up to a classic recipe for confusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    [QUOTE=Pierre;377938]
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...glish/decipherhttp://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/decipher[/URL]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-4hL_T_KgU
    Dear Pierre

    what is that meant to show us, one can write with either hand without smudging the material used.
    Its quite easy.

    if the writing was burred, it is highly likely that it had been in place for sometime. Indeed one of the arguments used by those who believe that the GSG is related to the murders is that if it was old, it would either have been rubbed out or been smudged. they argue that the witnesses to the GSG do not say it was smudged, and therefore it is fresh; of course the witness do not say it was not blurred or smudged either.

    s
    Last edited by Elamarna; 04-20-2016, 02:20 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X