Victorian crime statistics are iffy at best, and there were often different ways of collecting them. Thefts were often collated as 'lost property' for example. The introduction of compulsory education in the 1870's led to a decrease in convicts under 17 years.
Charles Booth, the social investigator, recorded an interview with Louis Vedy, y Division Kentish Town in 1897 who seemed to reflect the view that the last quarter of the 19th century was becoming more orderly.
'On the whole, he said, crime was decreasing, especially crime with violence. People are less brutal than they used to be. Change due he thinks to better teaching. Even the reformatories turn out a large proportion who become respectable citizens.'
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
More than one killer theory dismissed
Collapse
X
-
should read "2- Coroner wouldn't classify suspicious deaths as murders"
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View PostNo kidding, Maurice. I could get a new lawnmower for that price. Maybe even some gas to run it, too.
What about before 1888? Most books don't talk of that. What were the murder rates for the same area for the several years before the Whitechapel Murder Files were opened?
Roy
There seem to be two reasons (at least) for people saying that murder was rare
1- They weren't reported, by fear of reprisal. Gangs were a real threat, apparently. Also distrust of the police.
2- Coroner would classify suspicious deaths as murder.
Another good book is Stubley's 1888 where he talks about the murders of the year that were not in the vicinity of Whitechapel or attributed to JtR.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sasha View PostThanks Grave Maurice. The beauty of the subject matter is that we'll never know the answer ie all we have is theories. That's why it's so much fun (ie I mean beyond the gruesomeness of the subject matter)! Anyway, I just don't buy the generally accepted lone killer story. It reaks too much of the Warren commission endorsed lone killer story in JFK. Too many things don't fit! Now if that doesn't get a rise out of some of the more traditional bloggers, I don't know what will.Last edited by Outlaw; 09-23-2014, 10:10 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
programme
Hello Christer. Thanks.
In which case, a few brains aren't working according to programme. (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
solutions
Hello Christer. Thanks.
Not to mention a few INCREDIBLE ones. (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Barnaby. An excellent post. You are indeed correct about how the human mind works.
Cheers.
LC
I´m a Ripper Darwinist in that respect.
The best,
Fisherman
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Barnaby. An excellent post. You are indeed correct about how the human mind works.
Moreover, it must be said that those SAME patterns are sometimes correct, but not always. Hence, the investigation continues.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Troll strike? Here we go gathering nuts in May.
Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
Lately, I think Kate is getting clearer.
Intrepid, eh?
Cheers.
LC
See the "Jack the Ripper Kosher Cook Book", page 29.
Isenschmid Sheep's Head Broth.
1) Take three policemen.......etcLast edited by Observer; 08-15-2014, 04:25 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi John Wheat,
That is the real mystery we need to solve.
Jack was merely razzmatazz.
Regards,
Simon
Regards
Observer
Leave a comment:
-
patterns
Hello Barnaby. An excellent post. You are indeed correct about how the human mind works.
Moreover, it must be said that those SAME patterns are sometimes correct, but not always. Hence, the investigation continues.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
This is all very intriguing to me because I hold the exact opposite opinion: Women reduced to prostitution due to poverty are being murdered with sharp instruments in a small area over a fairly short time period, and my brain wants to form a pattern. I suppose it is the default thing to do. If anything, I want to attribute more than the C5 to "Jack the Ripper," not less.
The brain is funny though, and the propensity for it to see patterns sometimes leads us to see ones where they don't exist. And so I really look forward to reading Simon's book to challenge these conventional beliefs of a single killer.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: