Why weren't there any killings in October 1888?

[Simon Wood]

Hi David,

My post which you quoted was in reply to Michael and not about Anderson.

Do you not find it hard to believe that in the month prior to the Special Commission, a man so deeply mired in lies and deceit on behalf of his country as Anderson would be content to put his feet up in Switzerland?

His health trip is one of the many nonsensical propositions about the WM which we accept without blinking.

Hi Sam,

Yes, I found that reference in my travels. I also found a new 500-inmate workhouse being built near Newcastle in 1833 described as a "large Hotel d'Industrie". There is an hotel so named currently in Paris, but not in the 1880s, so I am wondering if the phrase may have another meaning.

Regards,

Simon

[The Grave Maurice]

Hi Eastender,

Weren't domestic servants in the LVP divided into, for want of better terms, the "inside" and "outside" variety? A servant who was involved in the hunts and tending the grounds would probably stay on the estate year-round. Would that type of servant likely be brought into town for the London season? And, in any event, how would any type of servant be able to wander around the East End in the middle of the night without his absence being noted either by his employers or the other servants?

[Eastender]

Hi maurice,
You have a very good point. To be clear Im not talking about an average servant, but one with very specific skills. Someone in my family does this job, and whilst they might be employed by a large establishment in town most of the year, they are required to attend various hunts in season, get loaned out to other households, and generally come and go as they please during this period. Not many people have this skill any more, but it would have been far more common in Victorian London. This is what has made me wonder if Jack began to ape his betters and 'hunt' in his own back yard, or even if he was hunting women for a wager by a group of rich thrill seekers bored with normal hunting...but this is just too horrible to think about. Sorry if this dosent make sense but as yet it is just a collection of thoughts and dosent flow very well.

[The Grave Maurice]

OK, I get you. While there was no shortage of slaughtermen and butchers in the East End who would have had the same skills, the nice thing about your theory is that it accounts for the lack of murders in October. You might well be on to something. And, like you, I think we can discount "The Most Dangerous Game" angle.

[Crystal]

Im not talking about an average servant, but one with very specific skills. Someone in my family does this job, and whilst they might be employed by a large establishment in town most of the year, they are required to attend various hunts in season, get loaned out to other households, and generally come and go as they please during this period. Not many people have this skill any more, but it would have been far more common in Victorian London.

Hi Eastender-can you elaborate on the kind of specialist posts you had in mind? I think your idea is interesting.

[Eastender]

Hi Crystal,
The post is specifically the hanging ,drawing and butchery of game meats. It involves taking the freshly killed animals, gutting them, cutting them as required for the table and preservation.In some cases cooking them too. Its very 'in house' to the oldest of British Establishments and has not changed since the 1760s.The Victorians loved game and it would have been a skill in great demand then.

[richardnunweek]

Hi,
Many explanations are possible why he did not strike in october.
1] The double event was to be his last venture, but something /someone triggered Millers court.
2] After the double event, there was two much police presense, and more public awareness.
3] He was out of the area, either by profession, or private matters.
4]He was unwell, mayby as a result of rapidly increasing insanity.
5] The Millers court murder/victim was premeditated for that very date.
I am sure there are more reasons, but the most likely should be present above.
Regards Richard.

[DVV]

Hi David,
His health trip is one of the many nonsensical propositions about the WM which we accept without blinking.

Certainly so.
Hence my complete lack of comprehension.
I'm confused.

Amitiés,
David

[DVV]

Hi,
Many explanations are possible why he did not strike in october.
1] The double event was to be his last venture, but something /someone triggered Millers court.
2] After the double event, there was two much police presense, and more public awareness.
3] He was out of the area, either by profession, or private matters.
4]He was unwell, mayby as a result of rapidly increasing insanity.
5] The Millers court murder/victim was premeditated for that very date.
I am sure there are more reasons, but the most likely should be present above.
Regards Richard.

Hi Richard,
fully agree with 1, 2, 5.

Amitiés,
David

[Eastender]

Hi Richard,
I totally agree with no:5. I think MJK was his 'prize'. Every killing up to that he was improving his skills. I think he had to learn how to quickly dispatch his human 'animal' as he had only worked on newly dead beasts. Only then could he bleed them and gut them like a dead deer.

[Michael W Richards]

Hi,
Many explanations are possible why he did not strike in october.
1] The double event was to be his last venture, but something /someone triggered Millers court.
2] After the double event, there was two much police presense, and more public awareness.
3] He was out of the area, either by profession, or private matters.
4]He was unwell, mayby as a result of rapidly increasing insanity.
5] The Millers court murder/victim was premeditated for that very date.
I am sure there are more reasons, but the most likely should be present above.
Regards Richard.

The killer of Polly and Annie was institutionalized by Oct, is another.

[SirJohnFalstaff]

Hi Richard,
I totally agree with no:5. I think MJK was his 'prize'. Every killing up to that he was improving his skills. I think he had to learn how to quickly dispatch his human 'animal' as he had only worked on newly dead beasts. Only then could he bleed them and gut them like a dead deer.

#5 makes me ambivalent. Unless he was expecting MJK's lover to move out, or was Barnett himself, and I don't really buy it.

[GUT]

And old one back to life.

Maybe he wasn't the total monster we imagine and for a little while managed to suppress the daemons he was battling.

[PaulWilliams]

One explanation for the October lull is that the killer feared detection. He knew that he had been seen by Schwartz and/or Lawende and may have been questioned during a routine police enquiry, or as part of the house-search.

[GUT]

Maybe the double event was enough to tide him over, or left him tired out.