JtR didn't just manage to divert attention away from gentiles in the 19th century, but has managed to succeed right up until the 21st century.
Many a Jewish suspect, contemporary and modern, have been blamed or implicated as JtR.
How does one interpret misdirection today by a serial killer who operated 127 years ago?
I agree with Shaw. Some genius has taken matters into his own hands and was able to manipulate both contemporary and modern anti-Semitic feelings to his own advantage.
He also brought it down on the government and the royals.
The investigators did believe some things where done to cast suspicion on the Jews. A position the old Jewish community also held.
For example, the graffiti on Goulston Street.
Warren - [could not understand the crimes] ‘being done by a Socialist because the last murders were evidently done by someone desiring to bring discredit on the Jews & Socialists or Jewish Socialists’
Warren - ‘evidently written with the intention of inflaming the public mind against the Jews’
Swanson - ‘to throw blame upon the Jews’
Smith - The writing on the wall may have been written - and, I think, probably was written - to throw the police off the scent, to divert suspicion from the Gentiles and throw it upon the Jews. It may have been written by the murderer, or it may not. To obliterate the words that might have given us a most valuable clue, more especially after I had sent a man to stand over them till they were photographed, was not only indiscreet, but unwarrantable.
If JtR did things to throw suspicion on the Jews, then surely due to the number of Jewish suspects being forwarded today, we have to conclude that JtR had tapped a vein in society that still feels itself in modern times. There can also be no accident or coincidence to this as the intention of blaming Jews was to encourage anti-Semitic mobs that had already had riots over Chapman, to go and do it again.
References: Chief Inspector Swanson and Sir Charles Warren, 6 November 1888, HO 144/221/A49301C/8c; minute of Sir Charles Warren, 13 October 1888, HO 144/221/A49301D/1; Smith, From Constable to Commissioner, pp. 161–2. http://www.casebook.org/ripper_media/rps.constable.html
Many a Jewish suspect, contemporary and modern, have been blamed or implicated as JtR.
How does one interpret misdirection today by a serial killer who operated 127 years ago?
I agree with Shaw. Some genius has taken matters into his own hands and was able to manipulate both contemporary and modern anti-Semitic feelings to his own advantage.
He also brought it down on the government and the royals.
The investigators did believe some things where done to cast suspicion on the Jews. A position the old Jewish community also held.
For example, the graffiti on Goulston Street.
Warren - [could not understand the crimes] ‘being done by a Socialist because the last murders were evidently done by someone desiring to bring discredit on the Jews & Socialists or Jewish Socialists’
Warren - ‘evidently written with the intention of inflaming the public mind against the Jews’
Swanson - ‘to throw blame upon the Jews’
Smith - The writing on the wall may have been written - and, I think, probably was written - to throw the police off the scent, to divert suspicion from the Gentiles and throw it upon the Jews. It may have been written by the murderer, or it may not. To obliterate the words that might have given us a most valuable clue, more especially after I had sent a man to stand over them till they were photographed, was not only indiscreet, but unwarrantable.
If JtR did things to throw suspicion on the Jews, then surely due to the number of Jewish suspects being forwarded today, we have to conclude that JtR had tapped a vein in society that still feels itself in modern times. There can also be no accident or coincidence to this as the intention of blaming Jews was to encourage anti-Semitic mobs that had already had riots over Chapman, to go and do it again.
References: Chief Inspector Swanson and Sir Charles Warren, 6 November 1888, HO 144/221/A49301C/8c; minute of Sir Charles Warren, 13 October 1888, HO 144/221/A49301D/1; Smith, From Constable to Commissioner, pp. 161–2. http://www.casebook.org/ripper_media/rps.constable.html
Comment