Originally posted by DJA
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did the murderer have anatomical knowledge beyond that of say a butcher?
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostFollowing the Kelly murder, one detective shared his thoughts on the perpetrator.
"Speaking of the Whitechapel murders in London, Private Detective Flinders said to a STAR reporter that no more mysterious crimes had ever been committed in the world What made them so mysterious was that there was no apparent motive. The victims were inmates of houses in the Whitechapel district and certainly the motive was not robbery, for there could hardly have been anything to steal. The murders, he thought, were committed by some person who is a crank on anatomy or possibly a religious crank who thinks by committing these murders he is going to reform the residents of Whitechapel..."
"If I should start out to investigate the murders," said the detective, "I would watch the museums of anatomy, spot the frequent visitors who seemed particularly anxious to study those portions of the human body which have been carried from the victims, and then keep an eye on him. I would also have the bookstores closely watched for some person not a physician who might purchase medical works. I would work the case on that theory, and think it would prove successful."
Evening Star, Washington, DC, 13 Nov. 1888.
Here is Gore's directory from 1860:
Here is a catalogue from 1877:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post
I still don't know where Tabram fits into this.
The frenzied stabbing is indicative of rage or some kind of picquerism. It was not evident in any of the other Ripper or Torso murders. That's why I've always erred on the side of caution when it came to including her.
Potential tangent incoming!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
very interesting wicky. thanks for posting. this is right up fishermans alley and his theory that the ripper/torsoman/lech, got his inspiration from the anatomical venus displays.
The frenzied stabbing is indicative of rage or some kind of picquerism. It was not evident in any of the other Ripper or Torso murders. That's why I've always erred on the side of caution when it came to including her.
Potential tangent incoming!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostFollowing the Kelly murder, one detective shared his thoughts on the perpetrator.
"Speaking of the Whitechapel murders in London, Private Detective Flinders said to a STAR reporter that no more mysterious crimes had ever been committed in the world What made them so mysterious was that there was no apparent motive. The victims were inmates of houses in the Whitechapel district and certainly the motive was not robbery, for there could hardly have been anything to steal. The murders, he thought, were committed by some person who is a crank on anatomy or possibly a religious crank who thinks by committing these murders he is going to reform the residents of Whitechapel..."
"If I should start out to investigate the murders," said the detective, "I would watch the museums of anatomy, spot the frequent visitors who seemed particularly anxious to study those portions of the human body which have been carried from the victims, and then keep an eye on him. I would also have the bookstores closely watched for some person not a physician who might purchase medical works. I would work the case on that theory, and think it would prove successful."
Evening Star, Washington, DC, 13 Nov. 1888.
Leave a comment:
-
Following the Kelly murder, one detective shared his thoughts on the perpetrator.
"Speaking of the Whitechapel murders in London, Private Detective Flinders said to a STAR reporter that no more mysterious crimes had ever been committed in the world What made them so mysterious was that there was no apparent motive. The victims were inmates of houses in the Whitechapel district and certainly the motive was not robbery, for there could hardly have been anything to steal. The murders, he thought, were committed by some person who is a crank on anatomy or possibly a religious crank who thinks by committing these murders he is going to reform the residents of Whitechapel..."
"If I should start out to investigate the murders," said the detective, "I would watch the museums of anatomy, spot the frequent visitors who seemed particularly anxious to study those portions of the human body which have been carried from the victims, and then keep an eye on him. I would also have the bookstores closely watched for some person not a physician who might purchase medical works. I would work the case on that theory, and think it would prove successful."
Evening Star, Washington, DC, 13 Nov. 1888.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Losmandris View PostI think that the very fact he 'ripped' his victims open and removed organs (a type of crime never really seen before) was always going raise the question of whether he had anatomical knowledge or be accused of being in some kind of related profession. Of course he could have had some knowledge but the fact is that its not like he had to. It not like there is something that would bar anyone from having a go?
I tend to think that he was not in the medical profession or even a butcher. His actions speak to me of someone who is possibly fascinated by the insides of the human body, specifically the insides of the female body. I think a doctor or even butcher would be able to use their profession to 'exorcise' as it were this fascination in what they did day to day. Very difficult back then for the average person who is pathologically obsessed with wanting to see the insides of a person to actually indulge that fantasy.Last edited by Filby; 08-08-2022, 02:27 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
Why don't you ask your Dr Biggs for a list of separate causes for a:
- Bloated face.
- Swollen tongue.
- Clasped fingers.
- Black blood in the brain.
Then ask him what single cause can produce all of them on the same body.
You might learn something.
Strangulation can (and usually does) leave a bruise or bruises, but this is not always the case. Suffocation is perhaps less likely to result in bruising, but it would, of course, be possible. So the presence or absence of bruising around the neck does not either prove or exclude strangulation/suffocation.
A swollen tongue and / or face are non-specific findings. Many people try to attribute such findings to particular causations, but often it means nothing as a variety of mechanisms (natural and unnatural) can result in the same appearance. There is also no guarantee that somebody’s description of a ‘swollen’ tongue or face represents genuine swelling, as appearances of bodies after death can appear peculiar to observers and prompt all sorts of not-necessarily-objective descriptions.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
I think what rattles a number of posters is, they all know you are mature & presumably experienced enough to know the real solutions to many of these issues we talk about. It's that you refuse to admit it, and prefer to peddle nonsense.
Everyone respects you as a professional, what is annoying is you do not live up to expectations.
I mean for my part, the thought that keeps running through my mind is (Dammit Trevor, your an ex-detective, so act like one!). But still, I could be wrong.
Detectives might be like doctors, we should always go for a second opinion.
I dont have the time to peddle nonsense unlike you
I know what I am talking about but it seems you dont
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Well you are quite welome to find you own forensic patholgist and ask the same questions that I asked Dr Biggs, these can be found in a chapter in my book featuring Dr Biggs and his review of not only the WM but the torsos as well, then I wouldnt have to keep posting extracts which you contiunally ignore
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Jack-Ripper...2497756&sr=1-3
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Everyone respects you as a professional, what is annoying is you do not live up to expectations.
I mean for my part, the thought that keeps running through my mind is (Dammit Trevor, your an ex-detective, so act like one!). But still, I could be wrong.
Detectives might be like doctors, we should always go for a second opinion.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Or perhps you have got carried away with this strangling idea, medical sciences have moved on since 1888 and what was said then may now prove to be incorrcet
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
- Bloated face.
- Swollen tongue.
- Clasped fingers.
- Black blood in the brain.
Then ask him what single cause can produce all of them on the same body.
You might learn something.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
Half the doctors in the world are right, the other half are wrong.
This is why patients are strongly advised to always seek a second opinion.
Apparently, you ignored that advise.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Jack-Ripper...2497756&sr=1-3
www.trevormarriott.co.ukLast edited by Trevor Marriott; 08-07-2022, 03:18 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
Yes, Trevor, all the various physical abnormalities can have different causes, IF, they appear by themselves, but NOT when they appear together following one incident. Perhaps he forgot to explain that bit.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: