Originally posted by RivkahChaya
View Post
So while the doctors may have been reasonably sure those injuries were not caused by the murderer, and they could reasonably assume that those injuries were picked up earlier in the night, and they may have been absolutely correct, they couldn't prove it. It should have been listed among the injuries. They don't get to decide what injuries don't go on that report. And on some reports, bruises and injuries that were established as clearly being days old were still listed. So why not this?
Comment