Faecal matter on apron piece

[Rob Clack]

Rob, the Whitechapel Murder file is for unsolved murders within a specified area and timeframe, its not a declaration they are part of any series. Bond and others created the so called series with their opinions and little else

Its a series of unsolved murders. And if you are refering to the Metropolitan Police. Than I have a lot more respect for there opinion then yours.

Rob

[Trevor Marriott]

Schools out

Schools out the kids are bored already

Phil,

You been to the Marriott school of posting?

Well you have certainly been to the Begg school of counter arguments which teaches how to argue against something but not provide any evidence to negate the issues you are arguing against.


Monty

[Monty]

And so the grand old diplodocus raises its docile head, chews slowly and.....and....

....Contributes nothing.

Every evidence is here on the boards Trevor.

There for all to see.

Monty

[Trevor Marriott]

And so the grand old diplodocus raises its docile head, chews slowly and.....and....

....Contributes nothing.

Every evidence is here on the boards Trevor.

There for all to see.

Monty

Well I suggest you take the blinkers and the rose tinted spectacles off then and take a long hard look at it.

[Simon Wood]

Hi Monty,

At the moment I do not know if "Jack" was a conspiracy [a group of people entering into a secret agreement to achieve some illicit or harmful objective]—or a plot [any carefully planned secret scheme, usually by a small number of persons, to secure sinister ends]—or an intrigue [duplicity and deceit for criminal or treasonous objectives]—or an illegal ploy [a subterfuge or gambit as part of an overall strategy] perhaps designed for the greater public good.

But I am more than willing to continue exploring such possibilities.

"I wish to state emphatically that in recent years the Police have succeeded only by straining the law, or, in plain English, by doing utterly unlawful things . . .’" Metropolitan Police Memorandum initialled by Dr. Robert Anderson, 13th December 1898: HO45/10254/X36450, sub. 77.

So what's to lose? Everything else has failed miserably.

Regards,

Simon

[Monty]

Now that Simon, it a contribution.

Trevor will do well to follow your lead.


Your explanation is clear to me. Thanks.

Monty

[Simon Wood]

Hi Monty,

Thank you.

Regards,

Simon

[Tom_Wescott]

"I wish to state emphatically that in recent years the Police have succeeded only by straining the law, or, in plain English, by doing utterly unlawful things . . .’" Metropolitan Police Memorandum initialled by Dr. Robert Anderson, 13th December 1898: HO45/10254/X36450, sub. 77.

Hi Simon, a very interesting quote you've found. This brings to mind another comment made either by Anderson or Warren in 1888 or 1889, regarding pushing the boundaries of the law, I believe in their door to door searches. Do you recall the comment I'm thinking of?

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[Simon Wood]

Hi Tom,

Sorry, I don't.

I'll have a trawl through my files.

Regards,

Simon

[lynn cates]

Porter

Hello Tom. Sounds like a quote from Porter's book. See if I can find it.

Cheers.
LC

[Damaso Marte]

(1) Diplodocus did not chew. It used its needle-like teeth to clip soft foliage from trees, then swallowed the foliage whole. This is why diplodocus needed such an enormous stomach (and a body to surround it), because unchewed food needed to digest there.

(2) A pedant could possibly turn Lynn's game against him and point out differences between Nichols and Chapman. Nichols had multiple cuts to the abdomen, for example (as did Eddowes, no?). And of course Chapman had organs removed, which Nichols did not. If these are the work of the same killer, we have somebody willing to do things to victim n+1 that he did not do to victim n.

(3) Lynn, how do you believe that Eddowes was subdued? She had her throat cut while laying on the ground, same as C1 and C2. (Or at least, if you are ruling out strangulation, what forms do you see as plausible?)

[Hunter]

Hi Simon, a very interesting quote you've found. This brings to mind another comment made either by Anderson or Warren in 1888 or 1889, regarding pushing the boundaries of the law, I believe in their door to door searches. Do you recall the comment I'm thinking of?

It was Warren in a letter to Home Secretary Matthews, and he points out the repercussions of doing such an illegal act.

[Tom_Wescott]

Hello Tom. Sounds like a quote from Porter's book. See if I can find it.

Hi Lynn. That's possible, but for some reason I'm thinking it's in 'Ultimate'.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

P.S. By the way, I have Bernard Porter's book, although I'm waiting to read it in full when my research comes back around to that.

[Tom_Wescott]

Hi Hunter, our posts crossed, but yes, it seems like we're thinking of the same thing.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[Monty]

Tom,

October 4th letter to be precise.

It seems former Lord Mayor of London, John Whittaker Ellis raised the issue with Matthews the day previous and Warren wrote in response to that.

Monty


PS Complete History P290