How realistic was it for JTR to disguise himself as a PC?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Leanne
    replied
    He would not have hidden his identity as a policeman or a detective, because it would have been too risky. It would have been easier to hide in civilian clothes of his or another class (up or down). Didn't he ever get any blood on himself? Would he not have prepared for such a tradgedy?

    Leave a comment:


  • Busy Beaver
    replied
    In a nutshell JTR when carrying out murders would not have dressed as a Policeman, as no witness descriptions (little as they were) never mentioned anyone walking or running away from a murder site in a Policeman's uniform. JTR would have stuck out in any one's mind, even just by one person. (Think Astrachan man in all his attention grabbing garb only being seen by Hutch).

    Leave a comment:


  • Leanne
    replied
    In the 1880s, fashionable Londoners left their elegant homes and clubs in Mayfair and Belgravia and crowded into omnibuses bound for midnight tours of the slums of East London. A new word burst into popular usage to describe these descents into the precincts of poverty to see how the poor lived: slumming. In this captivating book, Seth Koven paints a vivid portrait of the practitioners of slumming and their world: who they were, why they went, what they claimed to have found, how it changed them, and how slumming, in turn, powerfully shaped both Victorian and twentieth-century understandings of poverty and social welfare, gender relations, and sexuality. The slums of late-Victorian London became synonymous with all that was wrong with industrial capitalist society. But for philanthropic men and women eager to free themselves from the starched conventions of bourgeois respectability and domesticity, slums were also places of personal liberation and experimentation. Slumming allowed them to act on their irresistible "attraction of repulsion" for the poor and permitted them, with society's approval, to get dirty and express their own "dirty" desires for intimacy with slum dwellers and, sometimes, with one another. Slumming elucidates the histories of a wide range of preoccupations about poverty and urban life, altruism and sexuality that remain central in Anglo-American culture, including the ethics of undercover investigative reporting, the connections between cross-class sympathy and same-sex desire, and the intermingling of the wish to rescue the poor with the impulse to eroticize and sexually exploit them. By revealing the extent to which politics and erotics, social and sexual categories overflowed their boundaries and transformed one another, Koven recaptures the ethical dilemmas that men and women confronted--and continue to confront--in trying to "love thy neighbor as thyself."

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Leanne View Post
    Slumming:
    In the late Victorian era London's East End became a popular destination for slumming, a new phenomenon which emerged in the 1880s on an unprecedented scale. For some slumming was a peculiar form of tourism motivated by curiosity, excitement and thrill, others were motivated by moral, religious and altruistic reasons. The economic, social and cultural deprivation of slum dwellers attracted in the second half of the nineteenth century the attention of various groups of the middle- and upper-classes, which included philanthropists, religious missionaries, charity workers, social investigators, writers, and also rich people seeking disrespectable amusements.

    I can recommend the book "Slumming" by Seth Koven, which I've read many times.

    Leave a comment:


  • Leanne
    replied
    Slumming:
    In the late Victorian era London's East End became a popular destination for slumming, a new phenomenon which emerged in the 1880s on an unprecedented scale. For some slumming was a peculiar form of tourism motivated by curiosity, excitement and thrill, others were motivated by moral, religious and altruistic reasons. The economic, social and cultural deprivation of slum dwellers attracted in the second half of the nineteenth century the attention of various groups of the middle- and upper-classes, which included philanthropists, religious missionaries, charity workers, social investigators, writers, and also rich people seeking disrespectable amusements.


    Leave a comment:


  • Leanne
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post

    In an over-populated and largely anonymous part of London in the small hours of the morning, at a time in history when one impoverished man looked and dressed like thousands of others?
    That's exactly why a wealthy man would want to dress like one of the many impoverished thousands. And if Jack was a local man, didn't he get any blood on himself?

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael W Richards
    replied
    I believe that this notion of slumming is a hangover from the mid-century Hellfire Club mentality. That the poor and virtually unknowns from the East End were playthings, curios, entertainment...the thread question is really looking into the possibility that clothing that would blend in with the neighborhood might have facilitated his moving about after murders apparently unseen. A viable question, but I think in terms of a uniformed policeman, not probable. A Detective..maybe..they are just suited locals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Leanne View Post

    He would unless he wanted every other everyday person, his friends, witnesses or the police to identify him.
    In an over-populated and largely anonymous part of London in the small hours of the morning, at a time in history when one impoverished man looked and dressed like thousands of others?

    Leave a comment:


  • Leanne
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post

    Indeed And an everyday person who already wore such clothing would have no need to get in and out of a disguise.
    He would unless he wanted every other everyday person, his friends, witnesses or the police to identify him. It would have been too much work and too risky to hide as a policeman, when all he had to do was acquire items of clothing that suggested another class.

    Leave a comment:


  • bolo
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post

    Indeed And an everyday person who already wore such clothing would have no need to get in and out of a disguise.
    Agreed, and this specially goes for a disguise as a copper. First there's the problem of choosing the correct number and divison signature, then the killer would have had a lot to explain if he would have met a "colleague" of his alleged police station (who probably wouldn't have recognised him), and a policeman walking away from a scene of crime also would have raised suspicion.

    Then there's another point that should be taken into consideration, prostitutes and coppers were not on the best of terms to say the least, it also would have been quite risky to walk about alone in certain areas of Whitechapel and Spitalfields during the night in such a disguise. In short, the Jack the Copper theory is a dead end for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by bolo View Post
    Hi all,

    A disguise would not have made much sense in my opinion, his best bet was to blend with the crowd and I think he did just that. Just another guy with some form of hat or cap on his head and nondescript clothing in a sea of people with similar attire.
    Indeed And an everyday person who already wore such clothing would have no need to get in and out of a disguise.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Leanne View Post

    "Good evening Mrs Smith. I'm just off to Whitechapel, to experience how they live in 'prostitute Land'"...……"Don't mention my visit to the police!"
    Slumming wasn't about prostitution - neither was Whitechapel especially - and slumming wasn't of interest to the police. I don't imagine that slumming was particularly widespread either.

    Leave a comment:


  • bolo
    replied
    Hi all,

    here is a report from victorianlondon.org of a party of "adventurers" who went on a tour of Whitechapel, guided by a member of the force : London: A Pilgrimage, by Gustave Dore and Blanchard Jerrold, 1872. It's not really slumming but it seems that tours like that already were a thing before 1888.

    I haven't put much thought into JTR the slumming toff or commuting killer so far to be honest, I think he was a local man who knew the area well and had a place where he could clean himself and/or change his clothes after a murder.

    A disguise would not have made much sense in my opinion, his best bet was to blend with the crowd and I think he did just that. Just another guy with some form of hat or cap on his head and nondescript clothing in a sea of people with similar attire.

    Regards,

    Boris

    Leave a comment:


  • Leanne
    replied
    It was the idea of slumming that could have told the Ripper to use items of clothing to hide behind.

    Leave a comment:


  • Leanne
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    If slumming was as fashionable as they say, I don't see why being seen "in costume" should have been a problem.
    "Good evening Mrs Smith. I'm just off to Whitechapel, to experience how they live in 'prostitute Land'"...……"Don't mention my visit to the police!"

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X