Originally posted by Observer
View Post
What kind of knives were used?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Observer View PostSo in effect we are looking for "Jack The Clipper" ? It's about time we toe-nailed him. Although I suspect he's varnished into obscurity for all eternity.
i think we are closing in on him
moonbegger .
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry, I meant fingernail clippers, of course. Yes, varnish he did.
Leave a comment:
-
So in effect we are looking for "Jack The Clipper" ? It's about time we toe-nailed him. Although I suspect he's varnished into obscurity for all eternity.
Leave a comment:
-
The entirety of the Whitechaple Murders was done with a single set of toenail clippers.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Beowulf View PostHere is a picture of an antique head knife. They seem to be pretty much the same as today's head knives.
How do you carry this without sheafing it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View PostHi Errata,
Are you able to post an image of a "head knife" for evaluation?
Regards, Bridewell.
How do you carry this without sheafing it?
Leave a comment:
-
abatoir
Hello Colin. Thanks.
I see. I hadn't fully divined your attitude towards the tenants.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
por que?
Hello Ruby. But why make ANYTHING up? What is the need?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
authority
Hello Errata. Indeed. But Phillips was given preeminence here. Later on, he seems to have seen/been shown wounds simply by way of comparison. I daresay he even saw Kate's.
And certainly Baxter would be conversant with the wounds.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View PostCue Lechmere and / or Fisherman.
Regards, Bridewell.
what alternative do you suggest ?
Leave a comment:
-
The problem is that we are dealing with a lot of doctors and coroners. If one ME had examined all the bodies, we could be confident of any assertion that one showed expertise and another didn't. But a lot of times it comes down to which coroners had imagination and which didn't. A doctor with a dim view of humanity (and there were no shortage of them) could conclude that experience or expertise was required to remove a uterus simply because he didn't think anyone other than a doctor would be able to find the uterus. Or that experience was a necessity because the killer didn't completely trash the surrounding organs. Another doctor could conclude that since the cuts were not mathematically precise that the killer was a rank amateur. A coroner with imagination would be able to see that a man with middling knife skills and no professional knowledge of anatomy could commit these murders if the he also had imagination and curiosity. Differing levels of skill can be attributed to any number of factors other than a different man committing the crime.
Unfortunately, a compelling case can be made for almost any scenario given that we just don't have detailed autopsy evidence. Could he have tried to take a head? I suppose so. But we don't know because we don't know what damage was done to the spine other than the exterior vertebrae. If I knew that he had managed to core out a cervical disk, or if there was damage on the interior of the vertebrae, then a decapitation attempt would be fairly obvious. Personally, I think if he was going to take a head he would have, simply because in the end is not that difficult. Well, less difficult than an arm or a leg. But there is nothing in the injuries of about 10 victims that could immediately exclude the Ripper. A few doubts can be cast, but nothing solid.
Leave a comment:
-
Interruption
There is no reason to suppose Polly's assailant was interrupted.
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: