Perhaps the Ripper wore a Deerstalker because he had once worked as one . When a Deerstalker grallochs a deer it is very Ripper like . The knife used by the Ripper may have been a gralloching knife . Just a thought .
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was the Ripper a Deerstalker ?
Collapse
X
-
The first consideration of importance before leaping to those sorts of conclusions is to decide whether the witness is reliable and the description is likely to be accurate or not.
Jack seemed to have a few different hats, and could have been anything from a deerstalker to a sailor, judging by that.
Cheers,
Adam.
-
Welcome, Stephen:
The grallocher theory has been raised in the past, usually in connection with Prince Albert Victor as a suspect. (Great word, isn't it, "gralloch".) At least one witness did describe a possible suspect as wearing a deerstalker. The sailor idea came from a suspect's general appearance and the fact that he wore a peaked cap which, I assume, resembled those worn by seamen from the London docks.
The deerstalker hat was, as I understand it, designed to keep the sun off the face and neck of hunters in the country. You'd think that anyone spotted wearing one in Whitechapel would have attracted attention.
Comment
-
I have always had the strong impression that the Ripper may have worn more or less the same outfit or at least the same coat and cap every time he went out looking for a victim, and that the varying descriptions of a peaked, sailor's, or deerstalker cap could easily be put down to the witnesses being asked to recount something they glimpsed quickly in dim light and having no idea they should be paying closer attention because it would be important later.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kensei View PostI have always had the strong impression that the Ripper may have worn more or less the same outfit or at least the same coat and cap every time he went out looking for a victim, and that the varying descriptions of a peaked, sailor's, or deerstalker cap could easily be put down to the witnesses being asked to recount something they glimpsed quickly in dim light and having no idea they should be paying closer attention because it would be important later.
Comment
-
Stephen:
Fair enough, it's always a possibility....it's just that IMO we can't ( or shouldn't ) place too much faith in witness accounts when it comes to the smaller details.
Having said that, there's surely no doubt that Jack knew what he was doing with a knife. But then that could fall back to any number of occupations or hobbies.
Cheers,
Adam.
Comment
Comment