Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hiding in the Vigilance Committee

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Monty enters stage left and waits for audience applause.....not a sausage.

    OK, Greg,

    It makes one wonder what were the rules or strategies of the VC? Was it like kids playing hide and seek..........you two guys take Berner St.....you three guys work commercial road..split up and meet in the middle.........stuff like that....I wonder if anyone knows how they went about there surveillance....? How many were there? How long did they stay out?
    Each committee had its own variation on patrolling. Basically they were split into pairs with one or two at fixed points. They organised themselves in a very similar fashion to the Police. They liaised with the Police often, passing on information or suspicions. The majority of Bobbies welcomed this however a report in the Irish Times of Sept 17th does show a few PCs resented the Vigilantes, probably with just cause as some of the Vigilants held an air of superiority over the locals. The report, given by a bobby, reads:-

    It won’t last a month. They’ll get little help – at last no more help than anyone else – from our chaps: and if they get interfering with respectable people our men will ‘run them in’ as a caution for future behaviour. With regard to the roughs, well all I can say is ‘they will have a high old time of it’ and to the benefit of our men. They can, to use their own words, ‘smell a fly copper’ – i.e. plain clothes man; and when they get hold of an ‘amateur’ or two, God help the amateurs! Kicking a regular policeman is a pleasure at any time not lightly to be spoken of, but the chances of ‘booting’ the head or ribs of an amateur ‘slop’ will afford a new and indescribable pleasure, and one to be indulged in on every possible occasion. These ‘vigilants’ will be looked upon as ‘coppers noses’ or ‘coppers narks’ – i.e. police informers – and to use the roughs own words, ‘a copper’ is bad enough, but his nark!’ – well, kill him, and that is about what he will get, or something very near it. They have forgotten one thing in their outfit, and that is an ‘ambulance’ – that will be wanted oftener than truncheons. At least I think so.

    The hours of work varied. At their height, the Mile End Vigilance Committee had 50 men on their books 12 of these men a an intimate knowledge of the area and were chosen to lead these patrols. Patrols were noted, routes planned and anything suspicious pencilled in a notebook. Beats were undertaken as soon as the men finished their working day. These beats were finnished around 4 or 5am, in some cases when day broke. Now some of these men had a days work, these chaps tended to finish earlier, however those who could commit to a daybreak finished did so. These men equipped themselves with lanterns, sticks and something the Police never had, rubber soled boots.

    The senior members of the Commitee, Aarons, Lusk etc, stayed behind of an evening to tackle various issues such as a reward appeal and future beats. When these meeting were concluded these men would patrol the area themselves, ensuring those on the beat were conducting themselves correctly. Again, this was influenced by the Police. They held regualr meeting with the Police and took advice from them also.

    Members were, I believe, logged into a book whoever I dont think they were vetted to any great degree. I know many men who were unable to find work in the day voluenteered for vigilance work at night because on some occaisions tea and buns were supplied as refreshments.

    They also hired Private Dectective. Toms man Le Grand was one of these alongside Batchelor. These men were hired more to investigate than patrol and Im sure Tom could explain more.

    Now these were the committees. Along with those we have the 'Amatuers' or 'Independants'. Probably the most well know of these was Dr William Holt, the white eyed man. These guys worked on their own and were often more a hinderance as they were often watched by other vigilantes and Police due to their suspicious behavoir.

    Finally we have the News reporters who did a bit of sleuthing not for public gain but more to find titbits to use in their papers.

    I hope this covers some of your questions.

    Monty
    Last edited by Monty; 06-24-2010, 09:47 PM.
    Monty

    https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

    Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
      I found Monty's article detailed and well-researched, if a bit rose-tinted, but that's just a matter of our differing perspectives. I have it printed out and on my table at home as we speak, because I intend to consult it for my book.

      Yours truly,

      Tom Wescott
      Tom,

      I think that fair. It was kinda suggested I tackled this topic rather than I chosing it, and it may be due to that as to why it is a tad diluted.

      However I enjoyed researching it, and the people involved such as Bendoff.

      Monty
      Monty

      https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

      Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

      http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

      Comment


      • #18
        Hi Monty,

        I was curious while reading it if you had taken a look at my 'A Vigilant Interlude' in Ripper Notes #25?

        Yours truly,

        Tom Wescott

        Comment


        • #19
          Unfortuately I didnt have access to a copy Tom, else I would have.

          Monty
          Monty

          https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

          Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

          http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

          Comment


          • #20
            That's a shame, because it was part of my 'Berner Street Mystery' series, which was bloody brilliant.

            Yours truly,

            Tom Wescott

            Comment


            • #21
              Neil,

              Whether you "tackled" or "chose" the topic, it made me change my thinking, such that I wrote "Why No October Surprise" in, I believe, the next issue of Ripperologist, in which I made the argument that the vigilance committees may have been a major reason for no muders in October.

              In the spirit of Tom, a brilliant article brilliantly edited.

              Don.
              "To expose [the Senator] is rather like performing acts of charity among the deserving poor; it needs to be done and it makes one feel good, but it does nothing to end the problem."

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Supe
                In the spirit of Tom, a brilliant article brilliantly edited.
                Ahem. Mine was bloody brilliant, thank you very much. And damn you for not catching 'stationary'!

                Yours truly,

                Tom Wescott

                P.S. Gavin Bromley and Sam Flynn are still sorely missed.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Monty View Post
                  I know many men who were unable to find work in the day voluenteered for vigilance work at night because on some occaisions tea and buns were supplied as refreshments.
                  Thanks guys, your answers are much appreciated.

                  Here's my idea for a fundraising t-shirt:

                  >> RIPPEROLOGIST <<
                  Will Work For Tea and Buns.


                  Cheers,
                  Archaic

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Don,

                    Thank you. Suffice to say I had help from many others, including Jakey, Rob, Debs, Stewart, Adam and yourself. The kudos must be spread.

                    And whilst it was chosen for me, Im glad it was. Because I learnt so much from doing it. And your observation about the October lull as its know, hadnt occured to me until you mentioned it. I must say, I agree. For October was by far the most active month, with the comittees swollen with members, and this surely impacted.

                    Archaic,

                    Another surprising aspect was the use of female Salvation Army members as information gatherers. I thought it wuirky however I was reading Jack Londons Into the Abyss and not that many destitute working men were suspicious of these Sally Annes. Mainly because the feared these women were being used by the authorities to obtain information regarding crime.

                    Monty
                    Monty

                    https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

                    Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

                    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Hi Monty, thanks for the reply. Now I have another question for you...

                      What in the world does "wuirky" mean?

                      Best regards,
                      Archaic

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        It means Im using my mobile phone, with its tiny keyboard, to post.

                        I sometimes hit the wrong keys and miss the error when I check it.

                        I meant 'quirky'.

                        Monty
                        Monty

                        https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

                        Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

                        http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Too bad, I thought I was learning cool new British slang!

                          Cheers,
                          Archaic

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            list?

                            Has anyone tried compiling a list of the members of the Vigilance committee from press reports, etc.? I for one would be interested in seeing such a list.
                            Jeff

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Tom,

                              And damn you for not catching 'stationary'!

                              Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. On the other hand, should I post a list of all the ones I did catch?

                              Don.
                              "To expose [the Senator] is rather like performing acts of charity among the deserving poor; it needs to be done and it makes one feel good, but it does nothing to end the problem."

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Tom,

                                Gavin Bromley and Sam Flynn are still sorely missed.

                                Aye that. But you'll enjoy this--I was talking to Gavin just a couple of days ago and one thing he asked was "Is Tom Wescott trying to break my record for article length?" I assured him he still was number one. LOL

                                Don.
                                "To expose [the Senator] is rather like performing acts of charity among the deserving poor; it needs to be done and it makes one feel good, but it does nothing to end the problem."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X