Originally posted by sdreid
View Post

Yes, I agree his choice of victim is interesting - but let's be honest, without compromising his control over the situation, where could he access elderly people or kids? Homeless people, sure - but again, he would have to have disposed of the bodies, inevitably leaving evidence behind, whereas at a person's home, he could take note of what he made contact with, and later remove the trace when he cleaned up.
As for prostitutes - he could not be certain that he was safe picking a prozzie up. Not only is there a threat that he may get around the street girls before finding a suitable victim, and thus make his identity known, including specific details such as a car reg, etc., but he again would have to dispose of the body, avoid police stings as he picked subsequent victims, etc...
It was logical to move within the circles of vulnerable target groups without any of those risks - plus, the animosity towards gays in the police force at the time meant that the investigations may be toned down and muted, compared to a "normal" person's murder.
To catch a fish you must think like a fish!
Leave a comment: