Why face mutilations on last 2 victims only

[Malcolm X]

you only have to look at EDDOWES/KELLY to recognise the moster in him...but which monster we dont know........ the earlier 3 victims are different because maybe he was less experienced... not sure......but what you dont see with the first 3 are the face mutilations, which for him in his last 2 murders; is a different side of his personality shining through, this is quite interesting, why did he start mutilating the faces? and not Annie Chapman, bruises yes; but no mutilations.....

i dont think we can use the ``not enough time to mutilate the face `` with Chapman, because he didn't have much time with EDDOWES either, yet he did, this is quite interesting.

[jc007]

Could it be he was starting to feel some guilt and disfiguring the face would take away the identity of the victim or make them less identifiable as a person to the Ripper?

[Sam Flynn]

This is a duplicate thread

This is a duplicate thread, and most people have posted on the other one of the same name. To avoid confusion, I suggest we leave the present thread to wither on the vine.

(To be fair to Mal, he tried deleting the thread, but was too late.)