Then again there is always the theory that with the privacy of being indoors, the fire burning for warmth, and the sexual nature of the Ripper's crimes, he may have disrobed on this occasion, or at the very least taken his shirt off. That would have taken care of the problem of bloodstained clothes.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What would JtR do after Kelly?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mike Covell View PostHad a quick smoke of his briar root pipe, went to his bolthole on Leman-street, then hopped over the London Hospital gates, back to his ward in time for Breakfast!!
He didn't live in the area but he knew it very well. Liverpool St is so close. He'd be on a train and out of there. 2, 3 4 stops and he'd be home. Then he'd have to deal with what he'd done.
London Hosp is tempting, it really is. But I'm sure they kept records.
Hold on, you say, this 1888. They didn't log in and log out every patient.
Well, probably not. But it's reasonable to think some staff and patients would have noticed and said something? JMT.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Covell View Postit was an in-joke to Robert D'Onston Stephenson!
Comment
-
Originally posted by kensei View PostWell, in the spirit of humor then, how about an in-joke about Druitt rushing out of Miller's Court just in time to make a game of cricket?
But the inning's of cricket for Druitt? Much as he has always been such a terrific candidate for Jack, wasn't he playing somewhere that would have made it impossible for him to be killing in London and playing county cricket?
For a couple of the murders? If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will tell me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kensei View PostWell, in the spirit of humor then, how about an in-joke about Druitt rushing out of Miller's Court just in time to make a game of cricket?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nothing to seeDruitt? Much as he has always been such a terrific candidate for Jack.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mascara & Paranoia View PostBecause he topped himself after the Ripper murders or thereabouts? Yeah, that's an excellent argument for his candidacy as a suspect. He's as unlikely as Tumblety and Sickert and to think of them as possibly being Jack is a joke (no offence intended with my bluntness).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mascara & Paranoia View PostThat's a myth. Where's the evidence to solidify that story?
Since Pollys and Annies Inquests revealed the medical opinion that the killer sought to perform the mutilations and organ thefts which necessitated the killings themselves, meaning that organ extraction may have been his goal in those cases...and you have a story regarding 2 Teaching Hospitals being approached in late 1887 by an American "doctor" to see about acquiring uteri specimens to accompany research being sent to America...which only one denies when asked directly about the story...you have plenty of circumstantial reasons to keep this man in the Suspect Pool.
It would appear that Druitts candidacy drowns in that same pool, because he is only in it apparently based on some speculative gossip to figures of authority..even if by his family members, and an unproven theory that the man who kills Mary Jane went mad and would likely end his life soon thereafter. He leaves a suicide note with no confessions other than he thought he would end up like his Mother. Since the Ripper crimes were all in the past when he writes that, "would" becomes a revealing word perhaps.
Best regards all.
Tumblety is a very viable suspect even if he is a behind the scenes patron.
Comment
-
Hi Mike,
and you have a story regarding 2 Teaching Hospitals being approached in late 1887 by an American "doctor" to see about acquiring uteri specimens to accompany research being sent to America
Best regards,
Ben
Comment
Comment