Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
What we do know from sources is that it was a building site, possibly a good place to dispose of a body, it is possible it may have never been found. It was certainly in place for a number of weeks before discovery.
Given that a body was disposed there, security was probably not that strong.
It may not have been important to him as such, but was a good place to hide a body, and lets be honest that torso was at least partially hidden.
You have previously argued that the killer wanted to display the bodies of his victim, well this is not displayed is it?
It could have been left outside the site, displayed for all!
It could have been left in a prominent position on the site, displayed for a select few!
It was however placed in a cellar, Hidden from sight!
Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
Does that actually mean anything? If you insist on such cryptic replies may I respectfully ask you restrain yourself in instances like this, better and less annoying to just say nothing.
Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
I notice you have changed that has I was about to reply.
The original was much more interesting, it suggested a No, this suggests Yes.
I would suggest nothing which specifically links, of course may be wrong, only you know.
Steve
Leave a comment: