If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
In reference to traumatic brain injury - In 1848, Phineas Gage, a railway construction foreman, was injured in a blast by a tamping iron passing through his left cheek and out the top of his head, damaging the frontal lobe. Gage had been described as "hard-working and responsible" before the accident and afterward as "fitful, irreverent" and "impatient of restraint or advice when it conflicts with his desires". Gage was able to function in society - living 12 years after the accident and working as a stagecoach driver. This case is extreme but a person already disposed to violence, suffering a head injury could easily be tipped into the worst kind of violence.
Well, we decided to give you time to optimize your hiding arrangements.
I want to add that behavioral changes may also be the result of changes of the structure of the brain due to various things like cancer or even benign tumours.
The problem I see with both brain damage and genetic impact is that both may be a contributing factor when it comes to violent behavior, but as we do not know who committed the murders it may be misleading to focus too much on them. We just do not know if they actually played a role.
"The human eye is a wonderful device. With a little effort, it can fail to see even the most glaring injustice." - Quellcrist Falconer
"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem" - Johannes Clauberg
Well, we decided to give you time to optimize your hiding arrangements.
I want to add that behavioral changes may also be the result of changes of the structure of the brain due to various things like cancer or even benign tumours.
The problem I see with both brain damage and genetic impact is that both may be a contributing factor when it comes to violent behavior, but as we do not know who committed the murders it may be misleading to focus too much on them. We just do not know if they actually played a role.
I agree on the degree of emphasis we can place on these issues. I really appreciate the kindness of more time. Dave
Last edited by protohistorian; 06-20-2010, 09:30 PM.
Reason: spelling, my m key is beginning to stick
We are all born cute as a button and dumb as rocks. We grow out of cute fast!
The problem I see with both brain damage and genetic impact is that both may be a contributing factor when it comes to violent behavior, but as we do not know who committed the murders it may be misleading to focus too much on them. We just do not know if they actually played a role.
(emphasis through bold type is mine) Very true.
FWIW, I can't buy into the 'disordered' killer profile for JtR, and from whatever his killing frenzy may have originated from, I'd guess he was able to restrain it
when needed, up to the point of stopping it because of fear to be found.
Obviously, this is just my (wildly unsupported) humble opinion.
Thankfully the truth is printed in the article. This is NOT a violence gene. there is no 'violence' gene, and the gene will not cause people to be more violent. There are quite a few problems with this article.
This gene does not cause people to be violent, in the same way a so-called 'addiction' gene does not cause people to have a sudden urge one day to take up drinking. As for the gene being 'activated' by trauma, this again is not what it seems. Genes are either there or they aren't, and they either encode for a protein or they do not.
One thing seems to be overlooked in the male/female view of this. One has to wonder why this test was only carried out with male volunteers.
After all, in the case of boys, this gene could ONLY be inherited from the mother as it is X-linked.
So imagine if an affected male passed this on to his daughter with a mother who also had the variant gene, the daughter would now have two copies of this gene, i.e. homozygous.
and of course genes do not 'act on' enzymes. They provide the genetic coding for protein production.
This study should really be repeated with all female and mixed volunteers, and should alsoclassify the types of 'crime' which the volunteers are responsible for. This does not necessarily mean that they were violent, and the majority of crimes seem to have been committed by unaffected subjects.
I could go on, but you get the point
if mickey's a mouse, and pluto's a dog, whats goofy?
Comment