Originally posted by Fisherman
View Post
Firstly, to be specific there must be specific similarities, not the generic similarities in words. That we disagree on that is no surprise.
Large surely describes the length, to suggest they cannot be thin and large is strange.
"Could have been" yes i love that. Again non specific.
No we don't know that at all. You suggest such, it's a belief not a fact, but such does not and will not prevent it being presented as one will It?
No it's not lip gymnastics, it a reasoned assement of the evidence.
You disagree. Such is life.
STEVE
Comment