Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GSG xmas present

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    Pierre has now been added to the growing pile of fantasists who need a **** n' bull explanation for the serial murder of at least five women. What's so unpalatable about a knife-wielding psycho who just got his kicks from cutting up women? These people do exist, you know?
    Spot on.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Well no present this year, not surprised!
    No present this year?????!!!!!

    It's like the Grinch has stolen Christmas all over again.

    I have never been more upset.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Does anyone know what time Pierre will be posting his historical xmas present?

    Apparently it's going to be a special event.
    David,

    I think you need to understand that the present is a container offering all types of fantastic goodies inside.
    And like so many of offers like that when you open it there is just a note saying that the product is not yet ready and you can aply for it later.

    Reminds me of certain IT companies.


    Well no present this year, not surprised!


    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Pierre has now been added to the growing pile of fantasists who need a **** n' bull explanation for the serial murder of at least five women. What's so unpalatable about a knife-wielding psycho who just got his kicks from cutting up women? These people do exist, you know?

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Does anyone know what time Pierre will be posting his historical xmas present?

    Apparently it's going to be a special event.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Yes Steve, what is it about Jack the Ripper being allowed to go free by the authorities to commit more murders that sounds unrealistic to you?
    let me think David........

    ah yes, got it..... All of it!

    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post


    He was discovered late in the murder period.

    Pierre even at that stage they could still have stopped him, you claim they sent him away, he could therefore have been stopped true?

    Without supporting evidence I just cannot accept such a scenario.

    If you have such and produce it that position changes.



    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    What is it that sounds unrealistic to you?
    That they would allow him to walk away free!

    The whole story you give is just that at present; I am not saying it is untrue, but as it stands, with no supporting sources produced it reads like fiction, and I do not mean to be rude at all.


    If you are convinced, publish details and you certainly sound it, If not sure again I offer you the opportunity to do this in private in the first instance.

    Its up to you, the offer to check details is there.



    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Yes Steve, what is it about Jack the Ripper being allowed to go free by the authorities to commit more murders that sounds unrealistic to you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    QUOTE=Elamarna;403997

    Pierre
    The content is asking us to believe that a man kills because he thinks killing poor women, and not just killing them but destroying them, will prevent him facing justice of some kind. possible I suppose, in a deluded mind.

    It also ask us to accept that the authorities allowed this person to continue on, rather than stopping him, which despite what you say is easy.
    We locked up George III, no problem with putting someone, indeed anyone out of sight and sound.
    He was discovered late in the murder period.

    And then we are meant to accept that after all of this he is allowed to walk away free.

    On the face of it it sounds unrealistic.
    What is it that sounds unrealistic to you?

    Regards, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    To be fair, Pierre did say in the other thread that he needs time "to prepare the post and think it through" and wants to make it "a special event" so that probably explains the delay in getting this xmas present out to us. I imagine he is spending a lot of time 'thinking it through'.

    He did also say that the present will be provided on "Thursday or Friday" so there's still 24 hours to go for him to produce "a source which is important to the case" and which "will explain the Goulston Street Graffito".

    So perhaps he will post this xmas present for us to enjoy tomorrow.

    There is still hope I think. He will surely not let us down. Not at Christmas.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    At least that would useful.

    And it would probably be about as helpful in explaining the CSG.
    LOL! so true

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Maybe he means Sauce, you know Cranberry for on Turkey, Brandy for on Pud, etc.
    Ah yes, that makes sense.

    Far more sense than in the OP at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • Elamarna
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    But donīt you think it is interesting that the GSG has an explanation?

    You should not "believe" me, but you may at least try another thought.

    Look at the set of statements I make in the OP and say what you think. You can pretend it is just another ripperologic book or article.

    Without believeing it: What do you think about the content? What sort of a history is it?

    Regards, Pierre

    Pierre
    The content is asking us to believe that a man kills because he thinks killing poor women, and not just killing them but destroying them, will prevent him facing justice of some kind. possible I suppose, in a deluded mind.

    It also ask us to accept that the authorities allowed this person to continue on, rather than stopping him, which despite what you say is easy.
    We locked up George III, no problem with putting someone, indeed anyone out of sight and sound.

    And then we are meant to accept that after all of this he is allowed to walk away free.

    On the face of it it sounds unrealistic.


    Therefore to consider it as possible I at least need some details, indeed any scientist or historian would.

    I do not consider it anything more than one of many explanations for the GSG, how can i? There is no data!


    Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Will he be doing the present tomorrow then?
    And I'll probably re gift that one too, if so.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    you don't want--it was a lump of coal
    Coal... or..... doggie Doo.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X