Hate

[Pierre]

Hello Pierre,

You are going to gave to supply the source which causes you to "chose" to assume it to have been backdated. .because..quite simply..all known sources that I have come across date his resignation to before said murder.

I may be wrong here, but somewhere I recall his resignation document he himself wrote and dated as being dated before the murder? Perhaps another with a better memory than I can help?

But back to the point. Supply your source and all is then hunky dory. Thanks ☺

Phil

Hi Phil,

No problem. Use external source criticism.

What is the earliest source, apart from the source dated the 8th November, stating that Warren has resigned?

Regards, Pierre

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=Henry Flower;399976]

We all have so much invested in Pierre's work.

What do you - and anyone else - have invested in my work?

[Elamarna]

[QUOTE=Pierre;400053]

What do you - and anyone else - have invested in my work?

Time, spent reading the 3000+ posts i would suggest

Steve

[Henry Flower]

[QUOTE=Pierre;400053]

What do you - and anyone else - have invested in my work?

You tell me, Pierre! You seem to think we all need to be kept up to date with your research, despite not really being able to tell us anything testable about it. So YOU must think we have some need to know how it's going.

But you've guessed right: we don't. Because most of us had you pegged as a charlatan from the start, and the more you reveal the more amusing your theory becomes.

PS - I do just love the fact that you've learned the phrase "external source criticism" and no one's gonna stop you using it as often as you like, until everyone is convinced you ARE a bona fide historian.

[Henry Flower]

Incidentally, Pierre, I am almost certain I know who your suspect is.

[Pierre]

[QUOTE=Henry Flower;400069]

You tell me, Pierre! You seem to think we all need to be kept up to date with your research, despite not really being able to tell us anything testable about it. So YOU must think we have some need to know how it's going.

But you've guessed right: we don't. Because most of us had you pegged as a charlatan from the start, and the more you reveal the more amusing your theory becomes.

PS - I do just love the fact that you've learned the phrase "external source criticism" and no one's gonna stop you using it as often as you like, until everyone is convinced you ARE a bona fide historian.

In my country if someone was as rude as you are, Henry, he would have no friends.

Regards, Pierre

[GUT]

Incidentally, Pierre, I am almost certain I know who your suspect is.

I doubt it.


Mainly because I doubt he has one.

[Henry Flower]

In my country if someone was as rude as you are, Henry, he would have no friends.

Regards, Pierre

In my country, Pierre, we have this visceral loathing of arrogance, of patronising, and of bullshit.

I'm not sure if you're noticing this or not, but I am not alone in my view of your behaviour on these boards.

Goodnight cupcake

[Phil Carter]

Hello Pierre,

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1888/nov/13/metropolitan-police-resignation-of-sir

You will find that when read to the House of Commons his resignation letter was stated to be from 8th November.
Matthews, the Home Secretary, replied to this letter on the 10th November.


Surely..that is irrefutable evidence of the date of Sir Charles Warren's resignation as being BEFORE the death of MJK.

Now..your external source evidence please...to refute the above?
I am being open with source evidence. Instead of playing cat and mouse games...it is "put up your exact source or withdraw your claim" time.

Thank you.


Phil

[GUT]

Hello Pierre,

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1888/nov/13/metropolitan-police-resignation-of-sir

You will find that when read to the House of Commons his resignation letter was stated to be from 8th November.
Matthews, the Home Secretary, replied to this letter on the 10th November.


Surely..that is irrefutable evidence of the date of Sir Charles Warren's resignation as being BEFORE the death of MJK.

Now..your external source evidence please...to refute the above?
I am being open with source evidence. Instead of playing cat and mouse games...it is "put up your exact source or withdraw your claim" time.

Thank you.


Phil

Don't hold your breathe Phil.

[Phil Carter]

Don't hold your breathe Phil.

Hello GUT,

One never knows. Sometimes when one has one's back to the wall in a firing line..it provokes truth. Or gumption. Or spine.
We shall now see if Pierre has the gumption to produce his "external source evidence" refuting the actual date of the actual resignation letter... or the gumption to withdraw his claim entirely.

If this Pierre really DOES want to be taken seriously...at long last..then I am sure he will consider the above the only viable alternative.
(However..it is going to take some doing to trump the date of the actual resignation letter itself.)


Phil

[Mayerling]

Hello GUT,

One never knows. Sometimes when one has one's back to the wall in a firing line..it provokes truth. Or gumption. Or spine.
We shall now see if Pierre has the gumption to produce his "external source evidence" refuting the actual date of the actual resignation letter... or the gumption to withdraw his claim entirely.

If this Pierre really DOES want to be taken seriously...at long last..then I am sure he will consider the above the only viable alternative.
(However..it is going to take some doing to trump the date of the actual resignation letter itself.)


Phil

I know what you mean Phil, and I agree. But please don't use the verb "to trump" like that. It's has taken on a darker meaning this week.

Jeff

[Phil Carter]

I know what you mean Phil, and I agree. But please don't use the verb "to trump" like that. It's has taken on a darker meaning this week.

Jeff

Hello Jeff,

Agreed. Shall we say.. "put out of the picture" perhaps?


Phil

[Henry Flower]

Hello Jeff,

Agreed. Shall we say.. "put out of the picture" perhaps?


Phil

Or we could say, "However..it is going to take some doing to delete from the illegal private email server of accepted historical fact the date of the actual resignation letter itself."

Better? You're welcome

[Harry D]

Incidentally, Pierre, I am almost certain I know who your suspect is.

I thought somebody already does?

Sounded like Monty had uncovered Pierre's suspect but didn't go so far as to name him. Unless it was a joke that flew over my head (which admittedly is a sound possibility).