i am reviewing a number of aspects of the ripper case and have come across an issue with regards to the saucy jack postcard.
From what has been written suggests that the postcard was received at the central newsagency on October 1st. Is there any definate proof that this was the case.
The envelope is clearly postmarked October 1st so I do not beleive it could have been posted and deleiverd on the same day.
In this day and age the postal service are not that good and i am sure in 1888 they were very basic.
If this be true then this must add more weight to the fact that it was a hoax.
From what has been written suggests that the postcard was received at the central newsagency on October 1st. Is there any definate proof that this was the case.
The envelope is clearly postmarked October 1st so I do not beleive it could have been posted and deleiverd on the same day.
In this day and age the postal service are not that good and i am sure in 1888 they were very basic.
If this be true then this must add more weight to the fact that it was a hoax.
Comment