Originally posted by Wickerman
View Post
Now the difference with this kidney and one purportedly taken from Eddowes is that this kidney does not contain nor are there any traces of oxygenated blood.
A kidney removed at the crime scene and thus wrapped would be blood red.
Now take a look at the results as shown in the photo even despite the lack of oxygenated blood the cloth is heavily blood stained.
Now if you add the effects of the kidney and the uterus as shown in the previous pic you can clearly see what is described as a heavily blood stained piece of cloth.
Go back and read the various descriptions of the apron piece no where does it say "heavily bloodstained" in one it does mention stained but if it had been heavily bloodstained as you suggest it would have been mentioned as such.
So I say again this shows that the killer did not take away the organs in the apron piece.
Further tests carried out in my opinion tend to show that the killer did not wipe his hands or his knife on the apron piece.
Comment