Sir Charles Warrens transcription.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hunter
    replied
    I agree Steve.

    In the end, as I stated in an earlier post, it is the signature at the bottom of this manuscript that counts... no matter who wrote (in whole or in part) the text itself. If Warren signed it, then he signed off on it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steven Russell
    replied
    My (strictly amateur) opinion is that "Blamed", "Berners", and "Brothels" are all in the same hand i.e. Warren's, while "...the people in the streets..." etc. is by someone else.

    Best wishes,
    Steve.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    What's very characteristic for ALL these samples is the distinctive fashion in which Warren (?) – I guess it's probably all by him – draws the capital letters in the beginning of a sentence.
    Hi Maria

    Like the distinctive capital "R"s which are totally different in the sample provided by Monty, to everything which has gone before?

    But nonetheless if you choose to believe that the difference is purely down to the selection of one steel nib over another (I doubt Watermans 1884 invention had made it to London yet, but I may be wrong) then who am I to argue?

    Respectfully

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Thanks Monty, I downloaded it on my comp. Basically it looks like the same hand to me, on a real hasty look.
    Originally posted by Cogidubnus View Post
    I'm sorry...I admit freely that I have no expertise here, but to an untutored eye the capital T and it's linkage (or lack of) to the "he" in "The" seem to differ a lot...the construction and linkages of the small "p"s look to be at variance too...The Bs are more similar however...
    A handwriting by the same person is NEVER completely identical, but features small variations, even inside of the same document. For instance, Warren's small “b“s vary a bit inside of the same document. Now add different time, different pens, different paper, different ink, and you get a lot of little variables.
    What's very characteristic for ALL these samples is the distinctive fashion in which Warren (?) – I guess it's probably all by him – draws the capital letters in the beginning of a sentence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Maria,

    Here is another example of Warrens handwriting.

    Apologies for the format.

    Monty
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    I'm sorry...I admit freely that I have no expertise here, but to an untutored eye the capital T and it's linkage (or lack of) to the "he" in "The" seem to differ a lot...the construction and linkages of the small "p"s look to be at variance too...
    The Bs are more similar however...

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    OK, just noticed his signature on post #9. Doesn't change my impression.

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Originally posted by Hunter View Post
    Some correspondences could have been dictated to staff members. {...} Check the signature at the end of the 'people in the streets' document and see if the handwriting is similar/or not to the written script.
    Obviously, but to me these documents look completely similar, or maybe it's the sleep deprivation speaking.
    Can somebody post the signature from the “people in the streets“ document?

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Hunter,

    Absolutely right.

    Perhaps Warren got bored by the time he reached Page 6.

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Hunter
    replied
    Some correspondences could have been dictated to staff members. Would not have been unusual.

    Check the signature at the end of the 'people in the streets' document and see if the handwriting is similar/or not to the written script.

    In other words, the letter could be written by someone else, signed by Warren, and the copy of the graffiti (in Warren's hand) submitted with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Dave,

    Another Warren specimen for your consideration.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF1466 (468x640).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	241.5 KB
ID:	663714

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Arguably I'm super exhausted after a VERY LONG day and about to call it a night, but this looks all like the same hand to me, just different pens (resulting in different ink consistence) at different times.
    Don't wanna touch Abberconway territory here, but is it possible that Warren's 6th November report contains (later) additions?

    PS.: Perhaps I should remind people that one of my job descriptions consists of identifying authentic vs. non authentic hands (both in text and music).

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Hi Simon

    "Two different amanuenses?" - yes, or one's "his master's script" (lie down Nipper!)...but the two samples you've shown must surely be two separate hands?

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Dave,

    And here's a capital 'T' from Page 2 -

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Page 2.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	19.2 KB
ID:	663713

    Regards,

    Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Wood
    replied
    Hi Dave,

    Nothing is ever straightforward in Ripperology.

    For instance, Warren's 6th November report is in two different handwriting styles.

    Page 1 [including a capital 'B']—

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Page 1.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	22.1 KB
ID:	663711

    Page 6—

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Page 6.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	23.4 KB
ID:	663712

    Two different amanuenses? I don't know.

    Regards,

    Simon
    Last edited by Simon Wood; 04-20-2012, 01:59 AM. Reason: spolling mistook

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X