Originally posted by Bridewell
View Post
Then there's another way of looking at this.
To assume the GSG was written by the killer is to also assume that he thought the "word" could be a useful tool. Therefore, in order to stir up opinion against the Jews, he presumably decided to resort to written messages.
That being the case, doesn't our progression of thought lead us to ask,....why didn't he take the next obvious step, and write letters?
If we believe he is a message writer, then why not a letter writer?
How do you separate the two sentiments, do they not go hand in hand?
Think back to all those letters which at one time "have been" considered authentic, none of them "finger" the Jews.
The "From Hell", doesn't, the "Openshaw" does not, neither "Dear Boss", nor the "Saucy Jack" postcard.
Whoever wrote those letters conveyed only the "challenge to authority", and the obvious, "look what I can do", but nothing about "fingering" Jews.
Quite strange, if we assume "Jack" wrote the GSG.
Regards, Jon S.
Comment