The meaning of the GSG wording

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DVV
    Suspended
    • Apr 2008
    • 6014

    #556
    My dear Gut, you should know my broken-English isn't that subtile. It's actually and gradually getting worse.
    I remember having appreciated your post, though.
    My main point was about that old chesnut about anti Semitic graffiti being common... No graffito worded like the GSG was common, that I'm pretty sure of.
    Add the piece of apron, and the wole thing becomes not common at all.

    Cheers

    Comment

    • DVV
      Suspended
      • Apr 2008
      • 6014

      #557
      Now, according to Trevor Marriot's most gifted disciple, a dog dropped the piece of apron where it was found, while the graffito was the work of a bitter tabby.

      Comment

      • GUT
        Commissioner
        • Jan 2014
        • 7841

        #558
        Originally posted by DVV View Post
        Now, according to Trevor Marriot's most gifted disciple, a dog dropped the piece of apron where it was found, while the graffito was the work of a bitter tabby.
        I at one stage supported the dog hypothesis as being possible, but some research indicated that in the LVP stray dogs had become pretty rare in London.
        G U T

        There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

        Comment

        • The Good Michael
          Assistant Commissioner
          • Feb 2008
          • 3773

          #559
          Originally posted by DVV View Post
          My main point was about that old chesnut about anti Semitic graffiti being common... No graffito worded like the GSG was common, that I'm pretty sure of.
          Yes. The size of the text, the ambiguity of meaning...no one has been able to show us any examples of anything similar...and contemporaneous to this grafitti. Yet, Dew says it was common, and mant casebookers say it was common. Outside of a few photoshopped, comedic pictures, there has been no evidence of anything else.

          Mike
          huh?

          Comment

          • GUT
            Commissioner
            • Jan 2014
            • 7841

            #560
            G'day Mike

            But would we really expect to see any examples?
            G U T

            There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

            Comment

            • Wickerman
              Commissioner
              • Oct 2008
              • 14864

              #561
              Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
              Yes. The size of the text, the ambiguity of meaning...no one has been able to show us any examples of anything similar...and contemporaneous to this grafitti. Yet, Dew says it was common, and mant casebookers say it was common. Outside of a few photoshopped, comedic pictures, there has been no evidence of anything else.

              Mike
              Does Dew talk in general about graffiti?
              I just thumbed through the book, all I could find was:

              "There was no reason, so far as I could see, why this particular message should have proved more useful than many others which Jack the Ripper was supposed to have written". (p.137)

              Dew does pose the question as to why this graffiti should be the work of the murderer, so it was likely asked at the time. That the police were also not convinced.
              Regards, Jon S.

              Comment

              • The Good Michael
                Assistant Commissioner
                • Feb 2008
                • 3773

                #562
                Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
                Does Dew talk in general about graffiti?
                I just thumbed through the book, all I could find was:

                "There was no reason, so far as I could see, why this particular message should have proved more useful than many others which Jack the Ripper was supposed to have written". (p.137)

                Dew does pose the question as to why this graffiti should be the work of the murderer, so it was likely asked at the time. That the police were also not convinced.
                Jon,

                I was being somewhat sarcastic and was using what another poster said about Dew as a dismissal of anything regarding grafitti that Dew might have said. I peronally don't remember exactly what he said.

                Mike
                huh?

                Comment

                • Barnaby
                  Sergeant
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 767

                  #563
                  If he was in the habit of carrying chalk, why no messages on the other nights? Or for that matter, in blood at the Kelly scene (oh wait FM! ).

                  Comment

                  • caz
                    Premium Member
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 10569

                    #564
                    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
                    I recall mention being made of Walter Dew having alluded, in his memoirs, to the fact that anti-Semitic graffiti was common in the area.

                    I have no personal knowledge of this but I'm sure I've seen it posted.
                    Hi Colin,

                    Again, if this was the case, one would imagine the police were routinely coming across such messages and having to sponge them off to prevent trouble. Once the apron had been whisked off to the police station there would have been nothing to distinguish this example from any other, or connect it with any of the murders, or make it a case for special treatment. Yet we simply don't hear of other messages getting the immediate attention and reaction this one did - its speedy removal.

                    Love,

                    Caz
                    X
                    "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


                    Comment

                    • c.d.
                      Commissioner
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 6562

                      #565
                      Originally posted by caz View Post
                      Hi Colin,

                      Again, if this was the case, one would imagine the police were routinely coming across such messages and having to sponge them off to prevent trouble. Once the apron had been whisked off to the police station there would have been nothing to distinguish this example from any other, or connect it with any of the murders, or make it a case for special treatment. Yet we simply don't hear of other messages getting the immediate attention and reaction this one did - its speedy removal.

                      Love,

                      Caz
                      X
                      Hello Caz,

                      Wasn't this one erased because people were starting to gather and putting two and two together? Certainly that would differentiate it from other messages.

                      c.d.

                      Comment

                      • c.d.
                        Commissioner
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 6562

                        #566
                        My apologies for somehow not mentioning Lechmere in my previous post. Is it just me or are we experiencing Lechmere mania on these boards? It seems like every damn post is Lechmere.

                        c.d.

                        Comment

                        • lynn cates
                          Commisioner
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 13841

                          #567
                          equation

                          Hello CD.

                          "Wasn't this one erased because people were starting to gather and putting two and two together?"

                          Ah! You are the man I seek. On another site I started a thread trying to improve the GSG. As it is, it seems not damnatory of any. Perhaps you could help with the equation.

                          Cheers.
                          LC

                          Comment

                          • c.d.
                            Commissioner
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 6562

                            #568
                            Hello Lynn,

                            My understanding is (and I could be wrong) that some PCs were blocking it from view and that this started to draw attention because people were now aware of the double event. It would be reasonable for them to conclude that this might have something to do with it. Even if the police removed the apron and left the message, it would soon become apparent that the police attached some importance to this particular graffiti.

                            c.d.

                            Comment

                            • lynn cates
                              Commisioner
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 13841

                              #569
                              meaning

                              Hello CD. Thanks. Yes.

                              But I refer to meaning.

                              1. Killer or not?

                              2. Jew or Gentile?

                              (Feel free to add here.)

                              Cheers.
                              LC

                              Comment

                              • c.d.
                                Commissioner
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 6562

                                #570
                                Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                                Hello CD. Thanks. Yes.

                                But I refer to meaning.

                                1. Killer or not?

                                2. Jew or Gentile?

                                (Feel free to add here.)

                                Cheers.
                                LC
                                Hello Lynn,

                                I don't think the meaning was the issue. I think it was simply the word Juwes. A reasonable assumption on the part of the police would be that people would read the message, know that the police somehow attached importance to it and possibly conclude that it was a Jew who was doing the killing or was somehow involved. Next step retaliation against all Jews and possible riots. The police wanted to nip all that in the bud.

                                c.d.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X