Key question regarding the BBC 1973 series and the graffito

[jmenges]

Was it ever revealed who the "Senior Scotland Yard Detective" was that tipped the producers off to interview Joseph Sickert?

JM

[Simon Wood]

Hi drstrange169

Stephen Knight’s involvement with Joseph Sickert commenced a month after the BBC had aired the episode in which Joseph appeared – as Knight makes clear in his book. He had nothing to do with the BBC programme.

Regards,

Simon

[FISHY1118]

[Herlock Sholmes]

https://youtu.be/MwfR6zRXUxU

[FISHY1118]

Been there done that, you had your chance to discuss knight and all those thing you mentioned have already been explain many times you just didnt want to hear it . just like gull remember . all depends which source you want to believe, that goes for all 1 to 6 of your claims .

[Herlock Sholmes]

Your opinion on Chapman’s TOD according to Phillips is laughable Fishy.

When you are told by more than one poster, including quotes from numerous Forensic experts, that TOD estimates at that time were little more than guesswork your argument is that because doctors got it right three times then it proves the TOD estimates were always correct! This is childish thinking as anyone but you can see.

Just to make it worse I’ve never once said that Phillips couldn’t have been correct. Only that he could have been wrong and that other evidence points in that direction. Why can’t you grasp this?

The answer of course is that with you it’s not a case of just assessing the facts is it. Everything is about trying to fit the facts around the Knight theory. So it’s not a case that you believe Phillips to have been correct it’s a case of you want or even need Phillips to have been correct.

[Herlock Sholmes]

As ever, stopping of the feet wont get you anywhere .



Just so were clear these were not lies, all backed up with evidence. that you choose to ignore.

You have a staggering disregard for truth.

1. Crook’s Catholicism.
2. The non-existence of Crook’s supposed address.
3. The fact that Cook And Crook were two different women.
4. The non-existence of Sickert’s Cleveland Street studio.
5. The non-existence of the hospital.
6. The proof that Netley and Nickley weren’t the same person.

Those 6 specific issues Fishy. Stop changing the subject to Phillips and Cadosch when you know that that is not what I’m asking you about. You have claimed to be able to prove, with evidence, that you can disprove Simon’s research. You made this claim numerous times and you have consistent avoided talking about them. You have consistently failed to provide evidence. You even have the opportunity to discus this with Simon but you’ve ignored his request for very obvious reasons.

So come on.......where is you’re evidence. This is a true crime forum.

[DJA]

Phil grew up in Dublin,where Jack's wife came from.

[drstrange169]

>> (15) Jubel - Dancing In The Moonlight (feat. NEIMY) - YouTube <<

I prefer Thin Lizzy Strides, version. r.i.p. Phil Lynott.

[DJA]

Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum would have been known as the "Jubes", not the "Juwes", if anything. The whole "Juwes" thing is utter nonsense.

Nah.

The Jubels.

(15) Jubel - Dancing In The Moonlight (feat. NEIMY) - YouTube

[FISHY1118]

As ever, stopping of the feet wont get you anywhere .

you had your chance to and you blew it . I gave you more than one instance to acknowledge the many possibilities in regards to sickert ,gull t.o.d, long, cadosch but you couldn't see it . So i will continue to post my opinion about certain things where knight is concerned ,and where the crime scene evidence and inquest testimonies of the witnesses clearly suggest to me he was possibly right .but i just wont be discussing it with you , simple.

Just so were clear these were not lies, all backed up with evidence. that you choose to ignore.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Herlock , let me say this about you , as far as im concerned you can rant and rave all you like, it wont do you no good. your just behaving like a child . You sook because i wont discuss knight with you , and you know the reason why, you just refuse to accept it .
You had your chance to and you blew it . i gave you more than one instance to acknowledge the many possibilities in regards to sickert ,gull t.o.d, long, cadosch but you couldn't see it . So i will continue to post my opinion about certain things where knight is concerned ,and where the crime scene evidence and inquest testimonies of the witnesses clearly suggest to me he was possibly right .But i just wont be discussing it with you , simple.

No ranting from me. Just the truth. Facts and nothing else. All we get from you is lies and evasions. Let’s not forget that you also won’t discus the facts with Simon.

Im now tired and bored of trying to get sense or honesty from you. You are capable of neither. Anyone that makes claims without backup and resorts to lies and evasions isn’t worth the effort.

Perhaps you should start a thread called Fishy’s Safe Space.

[Sam Flynn]

Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum would have been known as the "Jubes", not the "Juwes", if anything. The whole "Juwes" thing is utter nonsense.

[drstrange169]

>>In the ritual of Master Mason, Hiram Abif was slain by three ruffians collectively termed The Juwes.<<


That attribution comes from Elbert Benjamine, who wrote it after Knights book. There is to date, that I've seen, no known reference in Masonic tradition to "Juwes".


As to the reference in Barlow and Watts show, wasn't Stephen Knight the researcher for that show?

[FISHY1118]

Herlock , let me say this about you , as far as im concerned you can rant and rave all you like, it wont do you no good. your just behaving like a child . You sook because i wont discuss knight with you , and you know the reason why, you just refuse to accept it .
You had your chance to and you blew it . i gave you more than one instance to acknowledge the many possibilities in regards to sickert ,gull t.o.d, long, cadosch but you couldn't see it . So i will continue to post my opinion about certain things where knight is concerned ,and where the crime scene evidence and inquest testimonies of the witnesses clearly suggest to me he was possibly right .But i just wont be discussing it with you , simple.