Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Long v. Halse

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Long v. Halse

    Apologies if this has been pointed out before.

    In my view, DC Halse's rendering of the graffito should be seen as more reliable than that of Long. Firstly as, according to this site, Long's original spelling of "Jewes" was corrected to "Juwes" and secondly as Halse has used inverted commas to denote new paragraph but still part of the quotation. Thus he has been careful to record the message line by line. This being the case, I believe we should trust him as to exact wording and spelling.

    Best wishes,
    Steve.

  • #2
    por que

    Hello Steven. I agree that Halse had a better take on the GSG than any one else that night.

    But isn't that a bit ironic? Wasn't Halse a City man? Why is he over on SY territory anyway?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Comment


    • #3
      Halse was a City man.

      There were no restrictions in persuing a crime.

      Monty
      Monty

      https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

      Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

      http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

      Comment


      • #4
        Long & Halse

        Originally posted by Monty View Post
        Halse was a City man.

        There were no restrictions in persuing a crime.

        Monty
        I'm researching this portion of my novel as I type this. Though there are minor inconsistancies, the gist of the text in both cases seems to be the same. It's just a damned shame Sir Charles didn't let them get a photograph before having the graffiti washed away.
        Neil "Those who forget History are doomed to repeat it." - Santayana

        Comment


        • #5
          Removed
          Last edited by Wickerman; 02-29-2012, 12:05 AM.
          Regards, Jon S.

          Comment

          Working...
          X