Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The GSG - Did Jack write it? POLL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I cited Paul Begg on Pipeman but this isn't sufficient for you...

    ...but that's okay because the contemporary view beats a conspiracy theory with even less, if any, evidence for it all.

    Btw, your clinical trial as you call it just guesses peoples heights involved.
    Bona fide canonical and then some.

    Comment


    • implication

      Hello (yet again) Batman. Thanks.

      "Warren uses the GSG to demonstrate JtR wasn't a socialist or a Jew."

      He used it in his private speculation. He thought someone was trying to implicate the Jews.

      By the way, he changed his mind about Socialists, but AFTER the Jonas story.

      Cheers.
      LC

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Batman View Post
        Warren uses the GSG to demonstrate JtR wasn't a socialist or a Jew.
        Forum for discussion about how Jack could have done it, why Jack might have done it and the psychological factors that are involved in serial killers. Also the forum for profiling discussions.
        No, Warren is giving his opinion as to whether JTR was a socialist or a Jew. And there is always the possibility that the author of the GSG was simply trying to throw the police off track (a theory supported by Smith).

        You also overlooked Smith's comment -- "It may have been written by the murderer, or it may not."

        c.d.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
          Hello (yet again) Batman. Thanks.

          "Warren uses the GSG to demonstrate JtR wasn't a socialist or a Jew."

          He used it in his private speculation. He thought someone was trying to implicate the Jews.

          By the way, he changed his mind about Socialists, but AFTER the Jonas story.

          Cheers.
          LC
          So? How does this show it wasn't a contemporary view? It was his view. I agree with him. Nothing novel on this from me.
          Bona fide canonical and then some.

          Comment


          • pulse

            Hello Batman. Thanks.

            If you are checking for a pulse, do you check the hand you are next (right) or the one lodged partly under her body (left)?

            Cheers.
            LC

            Comment


            • "We Jews are tired of being blamed for nothing. So take that."

              Anti-Semitic?

              Hello Lynn,

              Yes. I don't understand why more people don't see that as a reasonable interpretation. Not to say that that is the correct interpretation but it certainly seems reasonable.

              Would you agree that where you see graffiti disparaging a particular group that you are almost always going to see graffiti from someone in that group firing back? All it would take for a Jew to respond would be a wall and a piece of chalk.

              c.d.

              Comment


              • authority

                Hello Batman. Thanks.

                "I cited Paul Begg on Pipeman but this isn't sufficient for you..."

                If you wish to advert to authority--rather than thinking for yourself--why not quote Paul on Kosminski? You know, the JEWISH suspect? (heh-heh)

                Cheers.
                LC

                Comment


                • Originally posted by c.d. View Post
                  No, Warren is giving his opinion as to whether JTR was a socialist or a Jew. And there is always the possibility that the author of the GSG was simply trying to throw the police off track (a theory supported by Smith).

                  You also overlooked Smith's comment -- "It may have been written by the murderer, or it may not."

                  c.d.
                  What do you mean no? He invokes the gsg as evidence JtR wasn't a Jew. You said I was only one to do this. Clearly the contemporary says otherwise. Its nothing new at all.
                  Bona fide canonical and then some.

                  Comment


                  • Please name one person who corroborated Schwartz as being on Berner.

                    That is only evidence that no one else saw him not that he was lying. Don't we have other witnesses who are uncorroborated? Are we to doubt their stories simply because no one else was there at the time?

                    c.d.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                      Hello Batman. Thanks.

                      "I cited Paul Begg on Pipeman but this isn't sufficient for you..."

                      If you wish to advert to authority--rather than thinking for yourself--why not quote Paul on Kosminski? You know, the JEWISH suspect? (heh-heh)

                      Cheers.
                      LC
                      I addressed this exact point 2 pages back. So you don't reference sources? I think you are getting confused again. You just referenced someone a few posts ago. Wow.
                      Bona fide canonical and then some.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Batman View Post
                        What do you mean no? He invokes the gsg as evidence JtR wasn't a Jew. You said I was only one to do this. Clearly the contemporary says otherwise. Its nothing new at all.
                        Again, he is simply giving his opinion that doesn't necessarily make it so.

                        c.d.

                        Comment


                        • old fella

                          Hello John. Thanks for the kind words.

                          Might die of old age first. (heh-heh)

                          Cheers.
                          LC

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by c.d. View Post
                            Again, he is simply giving his opinion that doesn't necessarily make it so.

                            c.d.
                            The fact he gave one that is the same as mine means my view isn't unsupported in the contemporary. That's all.

                            Swanson dismissed the idea someone else besides BSman killed her based on the investigation. So did they investigate or not?
                            Bona fide canonical and then some.

                            Comment


                            • yes

                              Hello CD. Thanks.

                              Absolutely.

                              Cheers.
                              LC

                              Comment


                              • The argument is that the police immediately knew the nature of the graffito was anti-semitic, which is what prompted Arnold and Warren to have it erased before it would invoke an anti-semitic riot. I must be missing something because this doesn't add up. Surely a statement of Jewish solidarity from the killer would turn the locals against the Jewish immigrants, rather than an anti-semitic slur which implies the killer was a gentile?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X