Apron and GSG

[Pierre]

It would be nice with one relevant motive explanation for the GSG.

It would be nice with one relevant motive explanation for the piece of apron.

It would be nice with a relevant connection between the two motive explanations.

It would be nice with a long biographic history explaining this relevant connection.

It would be nice with evidence for the first and second motive explanation.

It would be nice with evidence for the relevant connection between the two motive explanations.

It would be nice with evidence for a long biographic history explaining this relevant connection.

It would be nice with a coherent history about the relevant motives, the relevant connection and biographic explanation, based on evidence for the motive explanations, based on evidence for the connection between them and based on evidence for the biographic explanation.

Or would it not be nice?

[Abby Normal]

It would be nice with one relevant motive explanation for the GSG.

It would be nice with one relevant motive explanation for the piece of apron.

It would be nice with a relevant connection between the two motive explanations.

It would be nice with a long biographic history explaining this relevant connection.

It would be nice with evidence for the first and second motive explanation.

It would be nice with evidence for the relevant connection between the two motive explanations.

It would be nice with evidence for a long biographic history explaining this relevant connection.

It would be nice with a coherent history about the relevant motives, the relevant connection and biographic explanation, based on evidence for the motive explanations, based on evidence for the connection between them and based on evidence for the biographic explanation.

Or would it not be nice?

it would be nice if you stopped posting posts with cryptic sayings and covert references to your suspect, who, without you naming him, and how said cryptic musings tie to him, renders your posts absolutely meaningless.